National

President Biden has made the COVID-19 crisis and a post-Trump return to national unity and traditional democratic ideals his top priorities. From vaccinations to stimulus to schools, Biden is seeking bipartisan compromise while showing a willingness to use executive authority and bare Democratic majorities in the U.S. House and Senate to implement his policies. Republican leaders are navigating deep party divisions over if and how to move beyond former President Trump.

Politics & Policy

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Saturday announced a congressional investigation into the local prosecutors reportedly preparing to indict former President Trump.

Driving the news: Trump said in a Truth Social post on Saturday he expects to be arrested on Tuesday as part of a Manhattan District Attorney investigation into hush money payments he allegedly made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Law enforcement agencies are reportedly preparing for the fallout from an indictment of Trump as soon as next week.

What they’re saying: McCarthy accused Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg of “an outrageous abuse of power” and of “pursu[ing] political vengeance against President Trump” in a tweet posted Saturday morning.

“I’m directing relevant committees to immediately investigate if federal funds are being used to subvert our democracy by interfering in elections with politically motivated prosecutions,” McCarthy said.

Leading GOP hardliners in the House, including Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), signaled support for the probe.

"[McCarthy] is right, and I fully support his call for an investigation," tweeted Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.). "No federal dollars should be used to prop up this radical, Soros-backed activist attorney or his gross political attacks."

The big picture: The new probe would fit into a network of investigations House Republicans are pursuing against other government bodies who they’ve accused of “weaponizing” federal resources to target conservatives.

Spokespeople for the House Oversight Committee and the Judiciary Committee, which have led most of the probes, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

McCarthy and Bragg did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 

The other side: Democratic lawmakers quickly accused McCarthy of his own abuse of power by using the federal government to crack down on local law enforcement.

Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.), the ranking member of Judiciary's "weaponization" subcommittee, said McCarthy is trying to "weaponize Congress to interfere in the rule of law and use committees to re-elect the twice impeached former president."

“Speaker ... who has no idea what evidence the state DA has in support of grand jury indictment seeks to 'weaponize' the federal government to undermine the rule of law for political purposes," tweeted Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), another member of the panel.

Go deeper: Timeline: The probe into Trump's alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels

Trump predicts he’ll be arrested Tuesday, calls for protests

Timeline: The probe into Trump's alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels

McCarthy orders probe of district attorney investigating Trump

The investigation will look at whether federal funds are being used.

Kevin McCarthy, wearing a blue suit, white shirt and pink tie.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images.

House GOP investigations

4 states move to bolster food aid after pandemic SNAP benefits end

Over 41 million people relied on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in 2022 alone.

A grocery store sign notes the acceptance of electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards that are used by state welfare departments to issue benefits on Dec. 4, 2019, in Oakland, Calif. Photo: Justin Sullivan via Getty Images

Food

Former President Trump predicted Saturday morning that he will be arrested next week, prompting a bevy of reactions from both sides of the political aisle.

The big picture: Trump, who called for protests to "take our nation back," has been bolstered in the hours since his Truth Social post by Republican lawmakers amid the Manhattan District Attorney Office's investigation into a hush money payment sent to adult film star Stormy Daniels. 

A Trump spokesperson told Axios in a statement that the former president does not have advance knowledge of an arrest, but that he is "rightfully highlighting his innocence and the weaponization of our injustice system."

If indicted, Trump would be the first president in U.S. history to face criminal charges.

Former Vice President Mike Pence said on SiriusXM’s "Breitbart News Saturday" that he was "taken aback."

“You have literally a Democratic Party that's literally dismantled the criminal justice system in that city, undercut the NYPD, and this is what the Manhattan DA says is their top priority?" Pence asked.

"It reeks of the kind of political prosecution that we endured back in the days of the Russia hoax and the whole impeachment over a phone call," he added.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) called for a congressional investigation into the prosecutors allegedly preparing to indict Trump.

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) called the "illegal leaks" about Trump's potential arrest "un-American."

"This is just a continuation of the disgraceful and unconstitutional pattern going back to the illegal Russian collusion hoax to attempt to silence and suppress the will of the voters who support President Trump and the America First Movement," she said.

Stefanik added that "America First Patriots" are "energized to exercise their constitutional rights to peacefully organize and VOTE at the ballot box to save our great republic."

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas): "The impending indictment of President Trump in NY must be treated as it is: a politically motivated prosecution based on a strained, convoluted legal theory. It makes clear the danger of a politicized 'justice' system that will be (is being) weaponized against ALL Americans."

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio): "I've been asked by multiple reporters if an indictment would lead me to rescind my endorsement of Donald Trump. The answer is: hell no. A politically motivated prosecution makes the argument for Trump stronger. We simply don't have a real country if justice depends on politics."

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.): "If the Manhattan DA indicts President Trump, he will ultimately win even bigger than he is already going to win."

"President Trump did nothing wrong and has always fought for the American people, and we all know it, which is why we love him."

"And any Republican who thinks the Democrats will stop this madness once Trump is out of the way is fooling themselves."

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio): "God Bless President Trump. Real America knows this is all a sham."

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.):  "The impending indictment is based on an untested, tortured legal theory. This is an absurd abuse of the criminal process in our politics. It must be seen for the partisan pathetic ploy it is."

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said "no one is above the law, not even a former President of the United States."

“The former president’s announcement this morning is reckless: doing so to keep himself in the news and to foment unrest among his supporters.  He cannot hide from his violations of the law, disrespect for our elections and incitements to violence," she said. "Rightfully, our legal system will decide how to hold him accountable.”

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) criticized McCarthy for launching an investigation, saying it is "all part of Trump’s playbook."

Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said McCarthy was "obstructing justice for the cult leader who got him those final speaker votes." 

Ex-Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty in 2018 to charges of tax evasion and campaign finance violations, told MSNBC that he thinks Trump's comments suggest the former president has inside information about a potential arrest and wants "another violent clash on his behalf."

Vivek Ramaswamy, who launched his 2024 presidential campaign last month, tweeted Saturday that an indictment "would be a national disaster. It is un-American for the ruling party to use police power to arrest its political rivals."

"Let the American people decide who governs. This will mark a dark moment in American history and will undermine public trust in our electoral system itself."

He called on Bragg "to reconsider this action and to put aside partisan politics in service of preserving our Constitutional Republic."

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich said a potential arrest "is another sign of the left’s insanity."

"To arrest a former and future President is an act of hatred and poison and will further harden support for Trump while discrediting  the left."

Go deeper: Looming Trump charges threaten to inject chaos into 2024 campaign

Editor's note: This story has been updated to add comments from Mike Pence and Elise Stefanik.

Manhattan District Attorney Office's investigation.

Trump allies back former president amid indictment speculation

"Real America knows this is all a sham," Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan tweeted.

Former President Trump speaks on March 13  in Davenport, Iowa. Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images

Donald Trump

Michael Cohen, a former personal attorney for Donald Trump, said in an interview with MSNBCon  Saturday that the former president's comments about a potential arrest suggest he has inside information and is looking to create "another violent clash on his behalf."

Driving the news: "This is exactly him reacting to information that he has, and not leaks, as he would like to say, by the district attorney’s office," Cohen said. "There [are] no leaks coming out of the DA’s office, that I can tell you for sure. This is all coming out of Trump camp."

Cohen said on Saturday’s edition of MSNBC’s "Velshi" that Trump isn't looking for peaceful protests but "wants another violent clash on his behalf." He called Trump's posts "eerily similar" to the "battle cry" he put out ahead of the Jan. 6 riot.

The "fools that are representing him, this clown show of lawyers, what they believe is that this will propel him into the White House by having another violent insurrection," Cohen said. "This time it would be in New York."

Cohen said Trump "will look to profit from this action by soliciting contributions in order to protect him" from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's ongoing investigation.

Context: Trump predicted in Truth Social posts Saturday morning that he will be arrested on Tuesday amid the Manhattan district attorney's investigation into hush money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels. 

Trump also told his followers, "Protest, take our nation back!"

A Trump spokesperson said in a statement to Axios that there "has been no notification, other than illegal leaks from the Justice Dept. and the DA’s office, to ... fake news carriers, that the ... Democrat prosecutor in Manhattan has decided to take his Witch-Hunt to the next level.

"President Trump is rightfully highlighting his innocence and the weaponization of our injustice system," the statement said.

Trump wants "violent clash" with calls to protest, Michael Cohen says

Former President Trump predicted in Truth Social posts Saturday morning that he will be arrested on Tuesday.

Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former lawyer and fixer, walks out of a Manhattan courthouse.

Michael Cohen, Trump's former lawyer and fixer, walks out of a Manhattan courthouse. Photo: Fatih Aktas/Anadolu Agency via Getty Image

Former President Trump and his family failed to follow the law by not reporting hundreds of foreign gifts during their time at the White House, House Democrats said in a new report released Friday.

Why it matters: According to the report, Trump's failure to disclose these gifts "raises new questions about whether these and other gifts may have been used by foreign governments to influence U.S. policy under President Trump," the report said. 

It raises questions about why "Trump failed to disclose these gifts to the public, as required by law," the report said. 

Driving the news: The 15-page report, released by the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability on Friday, said that Trump's White House failed to properly document more than 100 gifts valued at more than $150,000 that the former president had received. 

Trump and his family received 117 foreign gifts totaling $291,000 that went unreported, according to the report. 

Zoom in: The National Archives have no records of two sets of gifts from foreign officials, including a $3,040 driver and a $460 putter given to Trump from Shinzo Abe, then-prime minister of Japan, the report said. 

There are also no records of the "larger-than-life-sized painting” of Trump given by El Salvador President Nayib Bukele, according to the report.

Records obtained by the committee showed that the Trump administration and the White House Gift Office requested that the NARA transfer some foreign gifts back from the NARA to the White House, according to the report.

One of those gifts — which remains unknown — was sent from Egypt to Jared Kushner.

Flashback: The 15-page report from the House Oversight Committee comes after nearly a year-long  investigation into foreign gifts received by Trump.

In a letter in June of last year, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), alleged Trump failed to report gifts that Trump received from foreign governments.

The big picture: Like other federal employees, the president is prohibited from receiving personal gifts from foreign officials and governments without Congressional consent, Axios' Jacob Knutson notes.

Such gifts are considered property of the United States government and are then handled by the National Archives once they are reported to the State Department.

What's next: The committee said in its report it will assess whether legislative reforms are needed to make sure that foreign gifts records are preserved and made available to the public.

The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

Trump failed to follow the law on foreign gifts, House Democrats say

Trump and the first family failed to report 117 foreign gifts totaling $291,000, according to the report.

Former President Trump speaks at CPAC. Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Former President Trump said in Truth Social posts Saturday morning he believes he will be arrested on Tuesday amid a Manhattan district attorney's investigation into a hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Why it matters: Trump would be the first sitting or former president in U.S. history to face criminal charges.

Driving the news: "The far [and] away leading Republican candidate [and] former president of the United States of America will be arrested on Tuesday of next week," he wrote, citing "illegal leaks" from the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.

"Protest, take our nation back!" he added.

In a separate post on Saturday morning, Trump said America is "now third world" and "dying." He added that "American patriots are being arrested and held in captivity like animals," while also being critical of crime, inflation, prisons and mental institutions.

The district attorney's office invited Trump to testify before the grand jury as part of its investigation. Daniels and Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal lawyer, both met with prosecutors earlier this week.

A Trump spokesperson said in a statement to Axios: 

"There has been no notification, other than illegal leaks from the Justice Dept. and the DA’s office, to ... fake news carriers, that the ... Democrat prosecutor in Manhattan has decided to take his Witch-Hunt to the next level.“

"President Trump is rightfully highlighting his innocence and the weaponization of our injustice system. He will be in Texas next weekend for a giant rally."

Trump's lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, told CNBC on Friday that the former president will surrender to face criminal charges, should he be indicted.

“Will follow normal procedures if it gets to that point,” Tacopina told CNBC.

Worth noting: Trump, who has 24-hour protection from the Secret Service, is currently living at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

Background: A grand jury in Manhattan could indict Trump for his alleged role in the hush money paid to Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. Daniels claims she had an affair with the former president, which Trump has denied.

Cohen pleaded guilty to federal campaign finance violations in 2018 and was sentenced to three years in prison related in part to the $130,000 paid to Daniels.

Cohen later alleged that Trump directed him to make the hush money payments amid the 2016 presidential election campaign. Cohen said Trump then reimbursed him for the payment through the Trump Organization and the company cited it as legal expenses.

Legal experts have raised questions about the strength of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case against Trump, saying the district attorney will face several hurdles, per The Washington Post.

If felony charges are sought against Trump, Bragg would likely have to prove that Trump falsified business records to cover up Cohen's campaign finance violations, Axios' Zachary Basu writes.

The big picture: The grand jury in Manhattan could turn the 2024 campaign on its head by indicting Trump.

Trump would likely play the victim and vengeance card for 2024, which are already major themes of his campaign, Basu writes. The former president has already identified any and all investigations as "witch hunts."

But, there's no precedent for what's about to happen, leaving the United States political system in uncharted waters.

Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional details throughout 

Looming Trump charges threaten to inject chaos into 2024 campaign

"The far [and] away leading Republican candidate [and] former president of the United States of America will be arrested on Tuesday of next week," he wrote on Truth Social.

Former US President Donald Trump arrives on stage.

Former President Donald Trump on stage in Iowa. Photo: Kamil Krzaczynski/AFP via Getty Images

Top federal banking regulators will testify before a House panel this month in the first of several highly anticipated hearings on the Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank collapses.

Why it matters: With proposed new regulations facing difficult odds amid resistance from lawmakers in both parties, hearings and probes will comprise a key piece of the congressional response to the bank failures.

Driving the news: The hearing is scheduled for March 29, the House Financial Services Committee announced Friday. It will include testimony from banking regulators who were at the center of the federal response to the bank failures.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Martin Gruenberg and Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michael Barr are both slated to appear, with the panel saying additional witnesses could be added. 

What they’re saying: Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) and Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the chair and ranking member of the committee, said in a statement the hearing will "allow us to begin to understand why and how these banks failed."

"We are working around the clock to deliver answers to the American people in order to protect depositors, promote the safety and soundness of America’s banks, and strengthen our financial system," they said.

The backdrop: The Senate Finance Committee got the first opportunity to seek answers on the bank failures and the federal response in a hearing on Thursday where Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen testified about her department's 2024 budget request.

President Biden has pressed for Congress to pass tougher penalties on executives whose banks fail.

Go deeper: Banks brace for third week of drama with SVB up in the air

Banks brace for third week of drama with SVB up in the air

House sets first hearing into SVB and Signature Bank failures

The March 29 hearing will include testimony from FDIC and Fed officials.

Reps. Patrick McHenry, wearing a grey suit and blue bowtie, and Maxine Waters, wearing a white pantsuit and pearl necklace, sit behind the dais at a Financial Services Committee hearing.  

Reps. Patrick McHenry and Maxine Waters. Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images.

Silicon Valley Bank

The fight over abortion pills has been escalating since before Roe v. Wade was overturned, but the pills' availability is in danger now more than ever.

Why it matters: With pills now accounting for the majority of abortions, opponents of the procedure are focusing on legislatures and courts to erect barriers. But that's triggering thorny legal questions, foremost of which is playing out in a federal court in Texas over whether the FDA has the final say on whether the pills are safe.

Abortion pills have been available in the U.S. for decades, and while the FDA says that medical evidence shows they are safe and effective, the drugs have been subject of fights over manufacturing, distribution, insurance coverage and who can provide them.

Confusion around the drugs continues in the U.S., where nearly half of adults say they are not sure whether medication abortion is legal in the state they live in, according to a recent KFF survey.

Over half of abortions in the U.S. occur via abortion pills, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights. 

Abortion pills are often accessed online and mailed to patients, effectively working to circumvent state bans and restrictions that took effect after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Medication abortion normally consists of two pills: mifepristone and misoprostol.    

Mifepristone is approved by the FDA to be used alongside misoprostol to end a pregnancy during the first 10 weeks — this includes elective abortions and miscarriages. 

A patient first takes 200 milligrams of mifepristone orally to stop the pregnancy from growing. This is followed 1-2 days later by 800 milligrams of misoprostol taken buccally — placed between the gums and cheek — which causes cramping and bleeding to empty the uterus.

The mifepristone-misoprostol combination regimen has been found to be at least 95% effective at terminating a pregnancy.

Zoom in: Misoprostol — which is approved for the prevention and treatment of gastric ulcers — can also be taken on its own for medication abortion, a method that is supported by the World Health Organization.

While misoprostol is not specifically FDA-approved for abortions, it can still be used to terminate a pregnancy. A health provider has the authority to prescribe the drug for off-label use if they consider it to be medically appropriate.

The misoprostol-only method is slightly less effective than the combination regimen. A February study with over 1,000 U.S. participants found that using misoprostol alone was 88% effective at ending a pregnancy. 

How are the pills used in miscarriage care?

The mifepristone-misoprostol method is considered the most effective medication regimen for managing early miscarriages, per Planned Parenthood. 

The drugs are used to make sure that pregnancy tissue passes after there has been a miscarriage, which makes the patient experience bleeding.

While pregnancy tissue can pass naturally and take a few weeks to do so, the experience can be incredibly distressing for the pregnant person, so they can take mifepristone and misoprostol to ease and speed up that process.

Details: A 2018 study from the New England Journal of Medicine found that the combination regimen was more effective than the use of misoprostol alone, and reduced the likelihood for additional treatments — which might include additional doses of misoprostol or potentially surgical intervention.

Abortion pills are considered safe and effective by major medical groups, such as the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

"Medication abortion using mifepristone and misoprostol has always been part of my practice. It's incredibly safe and effective for people to end their pregnancies or to treat their pregnancy losses or miscarriages," said Jamila Perritt, president and CEO of Physicians for Reproductive Health and an OB-GYN in Washington, D.C., during a roundtable with abortion providers.

Zoom out: Mifepristone is approved for abortion use in over 80 countries.

Why is mifepristone at risk of becoming unavailable?

A coalition of anti-abortion groups in November filed a lawsuit challenging the FDA's overall approval of mifepristone. The plaintiffs argue that that the FDA did not properly authorize mifepristone for terminating pregnancies.

The lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Texas, where a Trump-appointed federal judge who has openly opposed Roe v. Wade is considering whether to temporarily block the FDA's approval of mifepristone, which would make the medication unavailable even in states that protect access to abortion.

Meanwhile: Two lawsuits in North Carolina and West Virginia are challenging restrictions in those states to settle the question on whether states can regulate or limit drugs that have been approved by the FDA.

Another lawsuit brought by Democratic attorneys general challenges the FDA's dispensing restrictions on mifepristone, arguing that they are "unnecessary" because they drug is considered to be safe and effective.

The FDA first approved mifepristone for pregnancy termination in 2000 under the agency's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, a program that adds dispensing restrictions to certain drugs, including requiring specific certifications for those who prescribe them. 

Since its initial approval, the FDA has loosened mifepristone's REMS restrictions over the years, including getting rid of the original in-person requirement and allowing the drug to be accessible via telehealth, as well as letting pharmacists become dispensing-certified.

State of play: Patients can go on websites like Aid Access, Hey Jane and Choix to get the drugs online and have them mailed.

Yes, but: At least 17 states have laws in place that prohibit the use of telemedicine to access abortion medication, and instead require patients to take the treatments in a health care facility.

So-called trigger laws took effect that can make it impossible for people to access abortion pills. Since then, pill providers have experienced soaring demand online.

Most of these bans and restrictions are specific to the pill provider, not the patient. As a result, a user could travel across state lines to pick up the pills. 

Some telemedicine providers — such as Aid Access — are located overseas and mail the pills to all 50 states. However, people who live in red states face a higher risk of prosecution.

What's happening: The FDA recently made a regulatory change to allow retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills, an update that looks to expand access as more red states move to ban or restrict access to abortion.

Walgreens and CVS, two of the largest U.S. pharmacy chains, have said that they plan to have some of their pharmacies certified to dispense mifepristone, as long as it does not conflict with state and federal law. 

Editor's note: This story has been updated with information about the lawsuit from Democratic attorneys general. 

How abortion pills work and why they're in the spotlight

Demand for abortion pills has soared since the Supreme Court decided to overturn Roe v. Wade.

A combination pack of mifepristone (left) and misoprostol tablets, two medicines used together as the abortion pill. Photo: Elisa Wells/ Plan C/AFP via Getty Images

Abortion

Axios Explains: Abortion

Public health

The U.S. faces a range of health care flashpoints — unaffordable drugs, opioids, vaping — as we debate whether to adopt universal care. For now, the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land, but Republicans want to issue it a final death blow.

Health

The former Minneapolis police officer serving time for the murder of George Floyd has pleaded guilty to two counts of tax evasion for the years 2016 and 2017, the local prosecutor's office said Friday.

Driving the news: Derek Chauvin, who appeared on video kneeling on Floyd's neck for more than nine minutes, was charged with aiding and abetting, failing to file tax returns to Minnesota.

From 2014 to 2019, Chauvin and his now ex-wife Kellie May Chauvin underreported their joint income by a total of $464,433, according to prosecutors. She pleaded guilty to tax evasion last month, per the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and will be sentenced in May.

He was sentenced to 13 months in prison Friday for the tax charges, with credit for 13 months already served, and agreed to pay restitution.

Don't forget: Chauvin was sentenced in 2021 to 22.5 years for Floyd's murder and later was sentenced to 21 years in prison with credit for time already served for charges that included violating Floyd's civil rights. 

The killing of Floyd, a Black man, sparked global protests in 2020 over police brutality and racism.

In January, Chauvin asked the Minnesota Court of Appeals to throw out the state's three murder convictions against him.

The court was expected to issue a ruling in response to his appeal within 90 days, AP reports.

Derek Chauvin, convicted of killing George Floyd, pleads guilty to tax evasion

From 2014 to 2019, Chauvin and his now ex-wife underreported their joint income by $464,433, according to the state.

A law enforcement officer escorts former police officer Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Photo: David Joles/Star Tribune via Getty Images

Saturday's politics & policy stories

McCarthy orders probe of district attorney investigating Trump

4 states move to bolster food aid after pandemic SNAP benefits end

Trump allies back former president amid indictment speculation

Trump wants "violent clash" with calls to protest, Michael Cohen says

Trump failed to follow the law on foreign gifts, House Democrats say

Trump predicts he’ll be arrested Tuesday, calls for protests

House sets first hearing into SVB and Signature Bank failures

How abortion pills work and why they're in the spotlight

Derek Chauvin, convicted of killing George Floyd, pleads guilty to tax evasion

Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

Biden to Congress: Ban execs of failed banks from the industry

Pentagon side-steps thorny gun issue in effort to reduce suicides

TikTok CEO: App sale won't address U.S. concerns

3 Virginia hospital workers charged in death of Irvo Otieno