National

The U.S. faces a range of health care flashpoints — unaffordable drugs, opioids, vaping — as we debate whether to adopt universal care. For now, the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land, but Republicans want to issue it a final death blow.

Health

Finish Line

Axios Finish Line

Fifty-nine percent of Americans disapprove of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and take away the federal protections of abortion rights, according to a new CBS News/YouGov reaction poll. Among women polled, 67% disapprove.

Why it matters: The new polling upholds what surveys before the decision showed us — that the majority of Americans support Roe.

52% call the court's decision a "step backward" for America, 31% say it's a "step forward," and 17% say neither.

Between the lines: Opinion is starkly divided along party lines. 78% of Republicans approve of the decision, compared with 38% of independents and 17% of Democrats.

What to watch: The public believes the court will reexamine other civil rights set by precedent.

57% think it's likely same-sex marriage rights will be limited, and 55% think access to birth control will be limited.

Where abortion access is guaranteed without Roe v. Wade

Democrats condemn Supreme Court's abortion ruling

Where abortion will be illegal with Roe v. Wade overturned

Poll: Majority of Americans disapprove of overturning Roe v. Wade

Opinion is starkly divided along party lines.

Outside the Supreme Court. Photo: Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images

Abortion

Politics & Policy

Media Trends

Axios Media Trends

Google search data shows Americans — particularly those in states most impacted by the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade —are scrambling to figure out where they can still get abortions and what the law means for future access.

Why it matters: Americans are trying to wrap their heads around what this means for the future of women's health.

On searches related to abortion, the top queries included, "is abortion illegal," "abortion ban states" and "abortion pill."

Those most actively searching were in political battlegrounds like Wisconsin, Michigan and New Hampshire — where there are no existing laws that would immediately ban or codify abortion rights, as well red states Missouri, Kentucky and Utah, where a trigger law has banned the procedure.

Top searches about the Supreme Court centered on which justices voted to overturn Roe v. Wade.

This analysis is based on Google Trends data from Friday and Saturday.

Between the lines: Searches for "abortion clinic near me" over-indexed in the Southeast, where a number of states had trigger laws on the books.

The top five states include Mississippi and Louisiana, where there were trigger laws in place, and Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina where there are not.

Searches for 'abortion pill' were highest in red states — Wyoming and Montana in the Mountain West were the top two, followed by Southeast states Louisiana, Georgia, Missouri and Arkansas.

The other side: Searches for "Planned Parenthood near me" were highest among blue states: Delaware, California, Oregon, Washington and New Jersey were the top-searching states in the aftermath of the ruling.

Overall search interest in abortion peaked at 10:56am ET on Friday, about 45 minutes after the decision was released.

What Americans are searching after Roe v. Wade reversal

The top searches for 'abortion clinic near me' were in the Southeast.

Vitals

Axios Vitals

Pfizer-BioNTech said Saturday that a trial of its two Omicron-modified COVID-19 vaccine candidates elicited a "substantially higher immune response" against Omicron BA.1 compared to the companies’ current COVID-19 vaccine. 

Why it matters: The news comes in advance of a meeting of a key FDA advisory committee Tuesday to examine how the composition of COVID-19 vaccines should be modified as the virus continues evolving and vaccine protection wanes.

What they're saying: “As we’ve said since the early days of the pandemic, we will follow the science and adapt our own approaches as needed to help address COVID-19 as the virus evolves,” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said in a statement. 

"We believe we have two very strong Omicron-adapted candidates that elicit a substantially higher immune response against Omicron than we’ve seen to date."

The details: The companies tested a vaccine candidate that targets the spike protein of the Omicron BA.1 variant, as well as a "bivalent" vaccine candidate that combined its Omicron-adapted vaccine with its vaccine for the original COVID strain.

The Omicron-adapted candidate given as a fourth booster dose increased neutralizing antibodies between 13.5 times and 19.6 times, depending on the dose administered.

The "bivalent" vaccine candidate increased neutralizing antibodies between 9.1 times and 10.9 times against Omicron, depending on the dose administered.

Yes, but: Omicron has continued to evolve with new subvariants.

Preliminary studies demonstrate both Omicron-adapted candidates neutralize the subvariants Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 to a lesser extent than they do for BA.1, the companies said.  

"We will therefore remain vigilant and are prepared to rapidly adapt our Omicron-adapted vaccine candidates to emerging sublineages if epidemiological and laboratory data suggest," Ugur Sahin, CEO and co-founder of BioNTech, said in a statement.

Pfizer says Omicron-specific COVID vaccine generates a stronger response

The news comes in advance of a meeting of a key FDA advisory committee to examine how the composition of COVID-19 vaccines should be modified as the virus continues evolving and vaccine protection wanes.

Photo: Sebastian Gollnow/picture alliance via Getty Images

COVID-19

Coronavirus

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Friday signed into law a bill to protect abortion providers and patients from bans, lawsuits and penalties in other states.

Driving the news: The measure is in response to laws like those in Texas and Oklahoma, which ban most abortions at early points in the pregnancy and encourage private citizens to sue those believed to be involved in obtaining an abortion.

It also comes following the Supreme Court's ruling overturning on Roe v. Wade.

The bill explicitly says that other state abortion laws enforced by civil action are "contrary to the public policy" of California.

Details: AB 1666 bars California state courts from hearing legal cases that were filed under other states' bans and "would prohibit the enforcement or satisfaction of a civil judgment received under that law."

"It puts up a legal shield for our doctors, providers and patients against attacks from the radical-right extremists who seek to strip women of their fundamental right," said California state Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, who introduced the bill.

What he's saying: "We will not cooperate with any states that attempt to prosecute women or doctors for receiving or providing reproductive care," Newsom said in a tweet.

Between the lines: Without Roe, the number of women traveling from other states to California for abortion care is expected to increase from 46,000 to 1.4 million, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights.

As a result, state officials want to protect California providers who give care to patients coming from red states that might potentially look to prosecute them, said Molly Robson, legislative director for Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California.

Newsom, along with Oregon Gov. Kate Brown (D) and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D), launched a "West Coast offense" to protect reproductive rights in their states now that Roe is gone.

Catch up fast: California's bill follows a similar one enacted in Connecticut, which also prohibits state courts from enforcing a different state’s penalties against someone who has provided an abortion that is considered legal in the state.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) in mid-June signed into law several protective abortion measures, including three that are meant to protect providers and patients from bans in other states.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) in March signed into law a bill that says that no state resident can "penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action" against a pregnant person, a provider or anyone who is "aiding or assisting" someone getting an abortion.

The big picture: Blue states are moving to protect abortion rights as red states continue to enact restrictive laws.

What we're watching: State lawmakers in New Jersey, where abortion rights are also protected under the law, have introduced legislation in response to civil lawsuit-enforced bans.

One of the bills being introduced in New Jersey would prohibit "extradition of an individual to another state if conduct relates to reproductive health services and is legal" in the state, said the bill's author, state Sen. Nia Gill (D).

Don't forget: California is already one of the 16 states that have codified abortion rights into their state laws.

Go deeper: Where abortion access is guaranteed without Roe v. Wade

California enacts bill to "shield" abortion providers and patients from state bans

The bill takes effect immediately after being signed by the California governor.

Picture of people holding signs in support of abortion rights

Photo: Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images

California

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade on Friday and send the question of abortion rights back to the states kickstarted a period of legal uncertainty that effectively halted abortion access across some red states.

Why it matters: For many Americans, especially those residing in the bluest parts of red states, abortions might not technically become illegal for a few more weeks — but they've instantly become almost impossible to obtain.

In Texas, Attorney General Ken Paxton confirmed that the state's "trigger" law will come into effect a month after the Supreme Court's official judgment, but noted that "some prosecutors may choose to immediately pursue criminal prosecutions based on violations of Texas abortion prohibitions predating Roe that were never repealed by the Texas Legislature."

That led Whole Woman's Health, America's largest independent abortion provider, to choose to stop abortions at its four clinics in the state, per the Texas Tribune.

In Tennessee, which also has a "trigger" law, Attorney General Herbert Slatery asked the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals to immediately end a stay on the state's separate 2020 law that would outlaw abortions after 6 weeks — a move that would effectively criminalize the procedure in most instances.

Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi told WPLN in a statement that it expects the stay to be lifted and has stopped offering abortions in the state as a result.

The other side: Blue cities in these states are discussing implementing policies of their own in an attempt to offer their citizens some level of abortion access, which Axios' Oriana Gonzalez previewed earlier this month.

In Austin, city council members Chito Vela and Vanessa Fuentes called for a special meeting to decriminalize abortion, part of a measure that would make enforcing Texas’ abortion ban of the lowest priority for Austin police. The move also would restrict the use of city funds and staff for investigations into abortions.

A spokesperson for Vela’s office previously told Axios that his office has been in contact with lawmakers in several other cities, including Dallas, San Antonio and Houston, who are interested in advancing similar measures.

Nashville Councilmember Freddie O'Connell tells Axios he is studying how the city could create an abortion access fund to provide ways for city residents to legally get abortions in other states. The city's district attorney has also said he won't prosecute abortions, although state law allows for a special prosecutor on certain charges.

The bottom line: More than anywhere else in America, residents of cities like Austin and Nashville will face the biggest shock from the Supreme Court's decision — with their immediate access to abortion cut off almost overnight.

Axios' Nicole Cobler, Nate Rau and Adam Tamburin contributed to this story.

Sign up for Axios Local, now publishing daily newsletters in 21 cities across the U.S.

Austin

blue

A daily look at the most significant and interesting stories affecting Austin. Written by Nicole Cobler and Asher Price.

Axios Austin

Standard

Austin Alerts

Alert

Axios Austin Thought Bubble

Thought Bubble

Austin Members

Membership

Post-Roe legal turmoil hits hardest for blue cities in red America

Cities like Austin and Nashville faced the biggest shock from the decision.

Illustration of a small blue megaphone against a red background.

Abortion laws around the world

Data: Center for Reproductive Rights; Map: Axios Visuals 

With the Friday's Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the U.S.  joined only three other countries — El Salvador, Nicaragua and Poland — that have rolled back abortion rights since 1994, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights. 

The big picture: Nearly 60 countries have liberalized their abortion laws — though some only incrementally — over the last 25 years. 

The rollback of abortion rights has come in countries "where democracies have eroded," said Margaret Harpin, a legal adviser at the Center for Reproductive Rights, which advocates for abortion rights advocacy and tracks abortion laws worldwide. 

At the same time, "we've seen a considerable amount of change in recent years, [and] an overall global trend towards liberalization" of abortion laws, Harpin told Axios before the Supreme Court decision. 

Here's a look at current abortion laws worldwide, according to research from the Center for Reproductive Rights: 

About 91 million women of reproductive age live in about 24 countries or territories that prohibit abortion under all circumstances.

El Salvador has some of the strictest abortion laws in the world. At least 180 women have been prosecuted for abortion or aggravated homicide after having obstetric emergencies, such as a miscarriage or stillbirth. After public pressure, some of these women have been released in recent years, though many remain in prison serving decades-long sentences. 

Nicaragua implemented a total ban on abortion in 2006. 

Honduras, which has banned abortion under any circumstance since 1985, hardened its abortion law last year by adding an amendment to its constitution, making it harder to change the ban in the future, abortion rights advocates say. 

Malta is the only EU member state to ban abortion with no exceptions. 

Other countries on this list include the Dominican Republic, Egypt, Haiti, Iraq, Madagascar, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Senegal and Suriname. 

Abortion is permitted to save a woman's life

42 countries or territories allow abortions to save a pregnant person's life. 

Chile currently falls into this category, but as the country drafts a new constitution, there are indicators it may include reproductive rights. 

Other countries on this list include Bahrain, Guatemala, Kiribati, Lebanon, Libya, Malawi, Myanmar, Nigeria, Oman, South Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda.

Nearly 50 countries or territories allow abortion for health or therapeutic reasons. Health is sometimes specified to include physical and/or mental health. 

Poland, where a large portion of the population identifies as Catholic, is among the countries that have rolled back abortion rights in recent years. Abortion is allowed in cases of rape, incest or if there's a risk to a woman's health or life, but "it is almost impossible for those eligible for a legal abortion to obtain one," according to Amnesty International.

Other countries in this category include Algeria, Bolivia, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Djibouti, Ecuador, Kuwait, Morocco, Pakistan, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Togo and Zimbabwe. 

Abortion is permitted on broad social or economic grounds

13 countries or territories allow "abortion under a broad range of circumstances." Some also provide exceptions in cases of rape, incest, fetal impairment or on other grounds. 

"These countries often consider a woman’s actual or reasonably foreseeable environment and her social or economic circumstances in considering the potential impact of pregnancy and childbearing," the Center for Reproductive Rights said in its research.

Among the countries on this list are Ethiopia, Finland, India, Rwanda, Taiwan and Zambia. 

Note: Some countries that allow abortion to save a woman's life, to preserve health and on broad social and economic grounds, may also have exceptions for cases of rape, incest, fetal impairment and/or other circumstances. 

Abortion is permitted on request (gestational limits vary)

At least 75 countries allow abortion on request, with varying gestational limits.

The most common gestational period is 12 weeks, but Harpin points out many countries, particularly in Europe, offer legal protections for abortion beyond that limit and/or other broad exceptions. 

Colombia this year decriminalized abortion. Abortion became legal in Argentina last year. Ireland legalized it in 2018. South Korea, New Zealand and other nations have also liberalized their abortion laws in recent years. 

Keep in mind: A country's laws don't always accurately reflect the reality on the ground, Harpin said. 

Costs, geography, health care and other factors can limit access — as they have often done in the U.S.

Without Roe in place, states can legally regulate or ban abortion. 

More than a dozen states have trigger laws in effect that make abortion illegal shortly after the ruling, and several more are "certain or likely" to ban abortion in the near future, according to the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks reproductive rights laws and advocates in favor of abortion access

Human rights groups and global leaders warned Friday that the U.S. Supreme Court decision could have wide-reaching consequences for reproductive rights worldwide by emboldening anti-abortion rights activists in other countries. 

Methodology, per the Center for Reproductive Rights: 

The categorizations reflect "a reading of the black letter law in effect in each country. Abortion laws are categorized according to provisions in national statutes, legal regulations, and court decisions."

Mexico's Supreme Court has liberalized abortion at the national level, but "each state will need to change its laws to adhere to this decision before we can change it on our map, in accordance with our methodology for federal systems." 

Go deeper: The state of abortion in America

Editor's note: This story has been updated with the latest details following June's Supreme Court decision. It was previously corrected to reflect that nearly 60 countries have liberalized their laws in the last 25 years, not nearly 50. 

U.S. joins only 3 other countries that have rolled back abortion rights since 1994

Nearly 60 countries have liberalized their abortion laws over the last 25 years, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Axios Explains: Abortion

China is becoming the most formidable rival America has faced, and the risk of confrontation with Russia, North Korea or Iran still looms. Authoritarians are rising, the chaotic Afghanistan exit revealed the limits of U.S. power, and the pandemic, climate change and other critical challenges continue to pose grave threats.

World

Thousands took to the streets across the nation on Friday to protest the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, as red states enacted trigger laws and blue states raced to protect abortion rights.

Why it matters: The ruling effectively made abortion immediately illegal in 13 states and cast a shadow over the future of abortion rights across the nation.

Driving the news: In Phoenix, a crowd of pro-abortion protesters gathered outside of the State Capitol on Friday. Some tried to enter the building, and police used tear gas in response, per a tweet from Arizona Senate Republicans. The gas seeped into the building, forcing lawmakers who were weighing an unrelated measure to call a recess.   

In New Orleans, crowds gathered outside a courthouse to protest both the ruling itself and the state's newly enacted ban on nearly all abortions, which does not contain exemptions for cases of rape or incest.

In Minneapolis, streams of protesters occupied the Washington Avenue Bridge. 

In D.C., Democratic members of Congress joined protesters in a march to the Supreme Court.

In Houston, protesters chanted "Democrats we call your bluff; voting blue is not enough" after gubernatorial candidate Beto O'Rourke (D) joined the rally.

Thousands showed up to Washington Square Park with signs and banners in New York City.

People in Northwest Arkansas took to the Fayetteville Town Square to call out the Supreme Court. 

Hundreds of people assembled in front of the Georgia state Capitol to protest the decision alongside state legislators.

The big picture: The Supreme Court's Friday ruling grants states the legal authority to ban the procedure at any point in pregnancy — including at fertilization, Axios' Oriana Gonzalez writes.

Without the Roe precedent, penalties for abortion providers are expected to become more severe. Abortion rights advocates fear states could grow more forceful in targeting patients who seek abortions.

The U.S. joins only three other countries — El Salvador, Nicaragua and Poland — in rolling back abortion rights since 1994, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Go deeper: How late in pregnancy each state allows abortions

Protests break out across U.S. after Roe v. Wade is struck down

The Supreme Court's Friday ruling grants states the legal authority to ban the procedure at any point in pregnancy.

Photo of a row of protesters holding a sign that says "Bans off our bodies"

Abortion rights demonstrators gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on June 24. Photo: Yasin OztÃ¼rk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Abortion-rights movement

The U.S. will see devastating economic consequences from the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, experts warned on Friday.

Why it matters: The landmark Turnaway Study found that women who have to carry an unwanted pregnancy were four times as likely to struggle with poverty years later. Raising a child costs over $230,000 on average, according to the Department of Agriculture.

What they're saying: "This decision will cause immediate economic pain in 26 states where abortion bans are most likely and where people already face lower wages, less worker power and limited access to health care. The fall of Roe will be an additional economic barricade," Heidi Shierholz, president of the Economic Policy Institute, said in a statement. 

"Abortion rights are economic rights, and this decision means the loss of economic security, independence, and mobility for abortion seekers. Low- and middle-income people, especially Black and Brown women, will bear the brunt of the impact."

"On the heels of the most recent economic downturn, where women experienced tremendous job and income losses compared to men, the Supreme Court decision makes it more difficult for women to regain their economic footing and to plan for their futures," C. Nicole Mason, president and CEO of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, said in a statement. 

"Further, the lack of access to the full range of reproductive health care services in the states, including abortion care, will have a devastating effect on women’s short-and-long-term earnings and income, job security and career advancement, and increase the likelihood they will become impoverished."

The big picture: In an amicus brief submitted to the Supreme Court last year, 154 economists wrote that there is "a substantial body of well-developed and credible research that shows that abortion legalization and access in the United States has had — and continues to have — a significant effect on birth rates as well as broad downstream social and economic effects, including on women’s educational attainment and job opportunities."

The brief pointed to studies showing that abortion access boosts women’s participation in the workforce, and that young women who used legal abortion to delay an unplanned start to motherhood saw an 11% increase in hourly wages later in their careers.

A woman's income would drop by 4%, however, every time she gives birth to or adopts a child — the "motherhood penalty," the left-leaning think tank Third Way found. 

Another study estimates that state-level abortion restrictions cost state economies $105 billion every year. Health experts have warned that such bans will also increase maternal mortality rates.

Abortions have been on the rise since 2017.

Yellen: Eliminating abortion rights would have "very damaging" effect on economy

Red states aren't prepared for a post-Roe baby boom

Fall of Roe will have immediate economic ramifications, experts say

"[T]his decision means the loss of economic security, independence, and mobility for abortion seekers."

Abortion rights activists rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court after the overturning of Roe vs. Wade on June 24. Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

After a record economic expansion, the coronavirus pandemic sent the U.S. economy into a recession as unemployment soared to staggering heights. The country now faces urgent questions about how much stimulus is needed for reeling consumers and businesses, and what a recovery might look like.

Sunday's health stories