Searching for smart, safe news you can TRUST?

Support safe, smart, REAL journalism. Sign up for our Axios AM & PM newsletters and get smarter, faster.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Searching for smart, safe news you can TRUST?

Support safe, smart, REAL journalism. Sign up for our Axios AM & PM newsletters and get smarter, faster.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Denver news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Des Moines news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Minneapolis-St. Paul

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Tampa-St. Petersburg news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa-St. Petersburg

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Photo: Xinhua/Ting Shen via Getty Images

The Supreme Court has tried to tread lightly so far in election-related cases — but that could change after Nov. 3.

The big picture: In its pre-election rulings, the court has largely preserved the status quo. But in the details and nuances of those decisions, it may have laid a foundation for a more conservative approach in its next wave of election cases.

Where it stands: The justices walked a complicated line through their pre-election caseload, most of which focused on extended deadlines by which absentee ballots had to be received.

  • Ultimately, they allowed extended vote-counting in Pennsylvania and North Carolina, but rejected it in Wisconsin.
  • The Supreme Court OK’d the two instances in which states — either state courts or state election officials — extended their own deadlines, but rejected the one extension, in Wisconsin, that came from a federal court.

What’s next: Pennsylvania and Minnesota are both states to watch as post-election litigation takes shape.

  • Both states are setting aside ballots that arrive after Election Day, in case a court rules they should not be counted — ballots Republicans have said will become a point of contention if election outcomes are close.

Between the lines: Most of the court’s pre-election rulings were not fully formed, precedent-setting Supreme Court decisions. They’ll have clear and direct bearing on the election, but they didn’t reach many firm legal or constitutional issues.

  • In Pennsylvania, for example, the court let an extended deadline stand but did not definitively rule on whether that extension was legal. It could revisit the issue if Pennsylvania’s results are in dispute.
  • The court seemed to want to avoid changing whatever deadline was in effect, so close to Election Day and with voting already under way, said Josh Douglas, an election-law expert at the University of Kentucky.

What they're saying: “The Court has shown that it is very sensitive to the fundamental issue of voter reliance," Biden campaign legal adviser Bob Bauer told Axios. If people vote the way authorities have told them to vote, "it seems highly unlikely that Court is going to retroactively authorize discarding thousands of votes.”

  • But there are good reasons to think the court could take a harder line in post-election cases.

The biggest change: Justice Amy Coney Barrett didn’t participate in any of the court’s pre-election cases, but she’ll be able to weigh in as new controversies reach the court — potentially strengthening the conservative bloc that came down against extended vote-counting in every case.

  • Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch all wanted the court to block post-Election Day ballots in North Carolina and Pennsylvania.
  • And Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a lengthy criticism of mail-in ballots in the Wisconsin case, strongly signaling that he’ll likely take a dim view of them in any post-election challenges.

Separately from its cases on absentee ballots, the court upheld Alabama’s statewide ban on curbside voting.

  • That kind of deference to states bodes poorly for voting-rights advocates in the long run, Douglas said, and in the Pennsylvania and North Carolina cases, the court’s most conservative justices indicated they wouldn’t allow any entity other than a state legislature to extend the deadline for absentee ballots.
  • That could make life harder for state election officials and courts trying to make judgment calls as vote-counting stretches past Nov. 3.
  • Even if post-election decisions on these issues don't impact 2020 outcomes, they could have significant impacts on future elections, experts say.

Go deeper

Updated Nov 22, 2020 - Politics & Policy

Trump campaign asks Georgia for another election recount

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Photo: Paras Griffin/Getty Images

Georgia will conduct another presidential election results recount following a Trump campaign request on Saturday.

Why it matters: State election officials and Gov. Brian Kemp (R) on Friday certified Georgia's election results that show President-elect Joe Biden officially won the state by just over 12,600 votes.

Nov 22, 2020 - Politics & Policy

Inside Republicans' troubled Election Day operations

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

As President Trump unsuccessfully argues fraudulent voter claims, campaign operatives tell Axios the reality is the joint EDO (Election Day operations) by the Trump campaign and Republican National Committee left them feeling largely unprepared to challenge ballots in real time.

Why it matters: With several states moving toward certifying election results this week, the postmortems are beginning as political operatives try to understand what worked, what didn't and how to adjust going forward.

Michigan board certifies Biden's win

Poll workers count absentee ballots in Detroit, Michigan on Nov. 4. Photo: Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The Michigan Board of State Canvassers certified the state's election results on Monday, making President-elect Joe Biden's win there official and granting him the state's 16 electoral votes.

Why it matters: Republican Party leaders had unsuccessfully appealed to delay the official certification, amid the Trump campaign's failed legal challenges in key swing states.