Washington House approves income tax after 24-hour debate
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

Illustration: Lindsey Bailey/Axios
An income tax on high earners is one step away from final passage in Washington state after the House approved the measure 51-46 Tuesday, capping a marathon floor debate.
Why it matters: If enacted, the tax would test long-standing legal and political barriers to a personal income tax in Washington.
State of play: The bill now heads back to the Senate for final approval.
- It would impose a 9.9% tax on annual income over $1 million — what supporters call a tax on millionaires.
- The measure would raise about $3.5 billion per year and affect roughly 20,000 taxpayers statewide, according to legislative staff estimates.
- It would take effect in 2028.
Context: The House debated the tax bill and proposed amendments for more than 24 hours, from 5:38pm Monday until about 6:10pm Tuesday.
- About 16 hours in, House Clerk Bernard Dean told Axios it was "certainly the longest floor debate in recent history."
- "I've worked here for 26 years and cannot recall a floor debate this long," Dean wrote in an email.
- Lawmakers then kept going for another eight hours.
Flashback: Washington voters have repeatedly rejected income tax proposals, and the state Supreme Court has historically treated income as property under the state constitution.
- Because the state constitution requires property to be taxed uniformly, that interpretation has posed a barrier to income taxes targeting wealthy residents.
What they're saying: Democratic supporters of the state income tax said it would raise revenue to help pay for priorities such as schools, health care, housing and public safety.
- "As a state, we are struggling to fund these vital services, and we are in desperate need of structural tax reform," state Rep. April Berg (D-Mill Creek), chair of the House Finance Committee, said during Tuesday's floor debate.
- The state's tax code "currently asks working families to contribute a greater share of their income than the ultra wealthy," state Rep. Sharlett Mena (D-Tacoma) said.
- Mena called that a "fundamental inequity in our tax system" that the income tax would help address.
The other side: Republicans argued that the tax was unconstitutional and that it would eventually spread to more people.
- They also argued that more of the revenue should go toward tax relief, such as lowering the state sales tax.
- "There is a pittance of relief for the taxpayers of Washington state," state Rep. Joshua Penner (R-Orting), said on the House floor.
What's inside: Senate Bill 6346 would use a portion of the new income tax revenue to offset existing sales and business taxes.
- The plan would repeal the state sales tax on diapers, over-the-counter drugs and personal hygiene products.
- It would also expand the Working Families Tax Credit to an additional 460,000 households, according to Gov. Bob Ferguson's office. Eligible families can receive rebates of up to $1,330 per year.
- Under the bill, businesses grossing $300,000 or less per year would pay no state business and occupation (B&O) tax, while those grossing $600,000 or less would qualify for a credit, according to legislative estimates.
The bill would then direct 5% of revenues to a fund that pays for child care programs.
Catch up quick: The daylong debate veered at times into theatrics.
- State Rep. Jim Walsh (R-Aberdeen) at one point quoted Monty Python — "No one expects the Spanish Inquisition" — when talking about tax projections.
- Earlier, state Rep. Brian Burnett (R-Wenatchee) recited part of the state's law against necrophilia, arguing that evading the income tax should not carry the same penalty as that crime, a class C felony.
- Another failed amendment would have blocked the tax from taking effect until the NBA brings a professional basketball team back to Seattle. (The Seattle SuperSonics departed for Oklahoma City in 2008.)
What's next: The Senate must approve the House's amendments before the bill can head to Gov. Bob Ferguson.
- Ferguson said last week he was willing to sign the House version of the bill.
- Lawmakers are scheduled to adjourn Thursday.
