Utah bill to limit traffic calming in Salt Lake City advances
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Brendan Lynch/Axios
A divisive bill that would curb Salt Lake City's ability to add traffic-calming measures on major roads without state sign-off cleared a major hurdle on Tuesday.
Why it matters: The proposal would make it harder for Salt Lake City leaders to design streets that prioritize pedestrians and cyclists, like those with dedicated bus or bike lanes, and instead encourage car-focused projects.
The big picture: Critics say the measure is part of a broader effort to assert greater state control over Utah's left-leaning capital.
Driving the news: The legislation passed the House Transportation Committee unanimously one day after the same panel failed to advance it on a tied vote.
- The deadlock was driven by a now-revised portion of the wide-ranging transportation bill that towing companies opposed.
State of play: SB 242 would require Salt Lake City to partner with the Utah Department of Transportation by 2027.
- The bill would prohibit highway reduction strategies, such as removing or narrowing lanes, on some of the city's most heavily traveled roads and require studies, outreach and state approval for changes to other busy corridors.
- It would also set timelines for the city to mitigate impacts from completed traffic-calming projects, including bus and bike lanes, on portions of 400 South, 200 South and 300 West.
What they're saying: The bill's sponsor, state Sen. Wayne Harper (R–Taylorsville), argues that the city holds statewide significance and is home to numerous state-owned facilities, including the flagship University of Utah.
- Salt Lake City Council Member Chris Wharton said at the Monday committee hearing that the city preferred "local control over our roads" but acknowledged Harper's concerns.
- He noted the bill has prompted doubts from the community, saying he looked forward to working with residents and state leaders to find transportation solutions.
- Salt Lake City has remained neutral on the bill amid negotiations.
The other side: The bill received pushback during yesterday's hearing from transit advocates, residents and cyclists, who said they rely on the road and safety improvements installed by the city.
- "I would prefer that the Legislature would leave Salt Lake City's control of Salt Lake City streets up to Salt Lake City," said Utah Rail Passengers Association executive director Mike Christensen.
Meanwhile, Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall took a more supportive stance, saying the measure is an improvement for the city compared with last year's bill, SB 195, that added restrictions to the city's autonomy to manage its streets.
What we're watching: With two days left in the legislative session, it's unclear whether any other changes will be made to the bill.
- It now goes back to the House floor for a vote.