May 14, 2024
🌮 Welcome to Tuesday! Let's dive in …
🎶 Today's last song is from our esteemed editor Chuck, who's still mourning the death of his college classmate Steve Albini: Nirvana's "Very Ape," from the Albini-recorded "In Utero."
1 big thing: ClearPath's next nuclear proposal
Harrell last week. Photo: Nick Sobczyk/Axios
New ClearPath CEO Jeremy Harrell is shopping a nuclear financing proposal to help get advanced nuclear projects off the ground, Nick writes.
Why it matters: ClearPath is a player on nuclear policy and an important architect of how Republicans talk about climate and energy.
- Harrell, who recently succeeded longtime CEO Rich Powell, will likely become a common sight in Hill hearing rooms.
Nick recently sat down with Harrell over Thai food. The interview has been edited and condensed for clarity …
Let's say the ADVANCE Act passes. What are the next steps on nuclear policy?
There are three policy opportunities that are out there that I think are important — and it is also time for the industry to start building.
We need to continue the momentum on NRC modernization. We just saw Tim Scott … introduce a bill that didn't make it in the ADVANCE package.
Two, I think we do need to find some solution to help finance some of these next wave of projects. We've been working with leaders on Capitol Hill on a financing proposal that I think could get some significant attention.
And then I think the spent fuel conversation is ripe again.
Can you elaborate on that financing proposal?
How do we give the ratepayer a little more certainty? As we're getting past these first-of-a-kinds, there is a little bit of a window where we need to bridge from project one to project five. That will make more states and more regions comfortable embracing nuclear as a big part of the solution.
Are you making the case to Republicans for the parts of the IRA you like?
Over the last eight years, [tax incentives have] been a big focus of ClearPath as a whole. The IRA just is what politicized this a little bit more.
Limited tax incentives … can drive investment and make these really sea-change infrastructure investments, can help catalyze American industry and help bridge the gap between new technology and full commercialization.
We know inevitably there's going to be a big tax package next year.
What are your priorities going into that 2025 tax debate?
Regardless of the political makeup postelection, a lot of horse trading is gonna have to happen.
Our big priorities in that case are how do we continue to ensure that credits like the clean electricity credit … are in place so that we can bring those technologies to market. 45Q — really, really important.
One opportunity that we think is interesting out there … is on the carbon dioxide removal side.
The new 45Q credit has a pretty robust incentive for direct air capture, but there are technologies other than mechanized direct air capture that are out there.
2. Digesting the FERC rule
Illustration: Gabriella Turrisi/Axios
Reactions to FERC's regional planning rule showed how difficult it will be to bridge the political divide on the issue, Nick writes.
Why it matters: The rule could help usher in a wave of big power line development, but it's not a panacea.
Driving the news: The commission, as expected, approved the rule on a 2–1 vote, with a handful of tweaks from the initial proposal two years ago.
- The final rule requires transmission providers to plan out 20 years into the future.
- And they'll have to use a slate of economic indicators — like alleviating grid congestion and extreme weather mitigation — when determining who pays for power lines.
Here's a good example of how the politics have played out:
- Sen. Kevin Cramer said the rule came at the "behest of radical environmentalists" and argued that it would lead to the heavily renewables-powered "grid that Democrats dream about."
- Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters that after Democrats failed to enact transmission policy in the IRA debate, they "persisted and found another path through FERC."
- And then the sniping started. After Schumer said that Congress likely won't do permitting legislation this year, Sen. John Barrasso issued a statement: "If permitting reform is dead, Sen. Schumer and Senate Democrats killed it."
3. Catch me up: Trade thoughts, new probes
Illustration: Tiffany Herring/Axios
💭 1. Tariff thought bubble: The administration's tariff hikes on Chinese goods will be a big deal for auto supply chains.
- But the increase for solar cells probably won't have a huge impact, given that many of those imports now come from Southeast Asia. The administration is also delaying some battery and graphite increases until 2026.
- That helps explain the mixed-to-positive reaction we've seen so far from the renewables industry.
- This is another sign that when it comes to trade, President Biden and former President Trump can actually be pretty similar.
☢️ 2. Banning together: Biden signed the Russian uranium ban into law yesterday, Axios' Sareen Habeshian reports.
- Go deeper: Read more from Nick about DOE's next steps and the implications.
👽 3. Fresh probe: Democrats on the House Oversight Committee are investigating Trump's meeting last month with oil executives. The Washington Post has more.
👀 4. GHG fund oversight: House E&C Republicans are out with a fresh letter alleging that EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund is sending money to Democratic political allies.
⚔️ 5. Defending priorities: The House Armed Services Committee unveiled the first draft of its fiscal 2025 NDAA, thus beginning the long journey of the Hill's favorite legislative vehicle.
✅ Thank you for reading Axios Pro Policy, and thanks to editors Chuck McCutcheon and David Nather and copy editor Brad Bonhall.
View archive


