Axios

When the State Dept temporarily shut down its unclassified email system in 2014, it was actually thwarting a Russian cyber hack, which new details indicate was a more aggressive attack than previously thought.

1. Russia wanted a confrontation: Russia wasn't just sleuthing around for intel when it hacked into the unclassified State Dept system. It was seeking a confrontation, and testing the US' willingness to escalate matters, per The Washington Post.

The White House discovered last month that President Obama's national security advisor Susan Rice made dozens of requests to "unmask" Trump transition officials in incidental collection of their communications with electronically monitored foreign officials, per Eli Lake in Bloomberg View.

• The caveats: Lake admitted last week that he'd been misled by Rep. Devin Nunes on a story about Obama officials incidentally surveilling Trump, and controversial pro-Trump blogger Mike Cernovich was the first to report this news yesterday.
• What it means: The standard for unmasking is that information "must have some foreign intelligence value," which is such a broad definition that it means Rice's requests were probably legal.
• What we do know: This new information does not validate Trump's wiretapping tweets as he specifically mentioned Obama administration surveillance of Trump Tower.
• What might happen next: Trump also tweeted that these incidental intercepts of his associates are unrelated to Russia. Maggie Haberman of the NYT astutely notes on Twitter that POTUS could simply declassify this intel to clear the air surrounding this incidental collection.

Last week, the European Union announced its draft guidelines for negotiating Brexit with the U.K. One controversial provision was that Spain would have veto power over any Brexit deal as it applies to Gibraltar.

Gibraltar is a tiny British Overseas Territory at the southern tip of Spain so it no doubt values a relationship with Europe — it voted 96% to remain in the European Union — but it also overwhelmingly chose British sovereignty in referenda in 1967 and 2002.

Former Conservative Party leader Michael Howard today hinted that the U.K. could defend Gibraltar militarily by invoking today's 35-year anniversary of the Falklands War:

Thirty-five years ago this week, another woman prime minister sent a task-force halfway across the world to defend the freedom of another small group of British people against another Spanish-speaking country. And I'm absolutely certain that our current prime minister will show the same resolve in standing by the people of Gibraltar."

It's safe to say that nothing will happen

— under NATO, Britain would have to go to war with itself to defend Spain — though PM Theresa May did call Gibraltar's leader to reiterate the U.K.'s support for the territory.