Your guide to Florida's other constitutional amendments

• All were placed on the ballot by the Florida Legislature. The abortion and weed measures got there via citizen initiatives.

Here's a rundown.

Amendment 1: Partisan Election of Members of District School Boards

• School board races have gotten more partisan in recent years. A vote for this proposal would enshrine that shift in the state constitution. 
• School board candidates would be required to run in partisan elections, meaning they would have to disclose their political affiliation on ballots. 
• It has support among the GOP and was placed on the ballot by Republicans in the Florida Legislature.
• Democratic lawmakers opposed it, per the Tampa Bay Times. It's also opposed by the Florida Education Association, the statewide teachers' union.

Amendment 2: Right to Fish and Hunt

• This measure would preserve the right to fish and hunt "including by the use of traditional methods." It would also make hunting and fishing the "preferred means" of managing wildlife. 
• There are no bans on hunting or fishing in Florida on the books or on the table; this proposal is preemptive, seeking to stop such restrictions from happening in the future.
• Nearly every member of the Florida Legislature voted to place the measure on the ballot.
• Animal rights and some environmental groups oppose it, saying the "traditional methods" wording could lead to practices that are cruel to animals, the Florida Phoenix reported.

Amendment 5: Annual Adjustments to the Value of Certain Homestead Exemptions

• This is, at its core, a tax break — although not much of one, a University of Tampa economist told WFLA: the average owner would save $7 in the first year and $40 by 2030.
• A "yes" vote would require that one of Florida's two $25,000 property tax breaks on your permanent residence, known as homestead exemptions, undergo adjustments based on inflation. 

• The proposal was approved by the Legislature mostly along party lines, per the Times.
• Opponents say the change would be a hit to local governments that rely on funding from property taxes and would shift the tax burden to non-homeowners, per the Phoenix. 

Amendment 6: Repeal of Public Campaign Financing Requirement

• This measure would nix a program that allows candidates running for governor, attorney general, commissioner of agriculture and chief financial officer to use public money in their campaigns. 
• The program has sent more than $33 million of taxpayer funding  to political campaigns since 2010, the Miami Herald reported. Recipients must agree to audits and spending limits, per the Times.
• It's supported by legislative Republicans, who say it's an inappropriate use of public funds.
• Opponents say it could discourage people from seeking those offices and grant corporations and wealthy donors more influence in races, per the Herald.