City Council wants to make governing less hectic

Richmond is 18 years and three mayors deep into its experiment with the strong-mayor form of government.

What's happening: There have been, ahem, some bumps along the way.

• In recognition of that fact, the Richmond City Council has established an official Charter Review Commission to consider what, if any, changes might make city government work better.

Flashback: Up until 2005, the mayor was a member of the council chosen to serve by his or her colleagues in an almost entirely ceremonial role.

• That changed after city residents overwhelmingly voted in favor of a charter change to directly elect a mayor, a change that was pitched as a way to bring a unifying vision to city government.

Why it matters: A unifying vision has remained elusive amid years of infighting between the mayor, council and school board, which regularly make the city appear disorganized and dysfunctional.

• Maybe it doesn't have to be this way.

Details: Here's a look at a few of the ideas currently under consideration to make things work better.

🧨 At the extreme, tear-it-all-up end of the spectrum, the commission is weighing whether the entire council-mayor relationship needs a revamp.

• One possibility: Reduce the number of council members from nine to six. Seat the mayor on the council as a seventh voting member — a move that would literally force everyone in a room to work together.

The commission is also weighing smaller tweaks, including:

💸 Pay increases: For both the council and mayor in hopes of attracting a stronger field of candidates. Council members currently make $26,00 a year, and the mayor is paid $125,000.

🥊 Increased mayoral authority: Currently the mayor's only direct hire is the city's chief administrative officer. The commission is thinking about suggesting recasting the mayor's role as a chief executive who would also have the authority to hire all department heads, affording more direct oversight.

👁 Increased council oversight: The commission also thinks it might make sense to give the council a more defined role in hiring the chief administrative officer, with confirmation hearings plus the authority to fire the person later with a super-majority vote.

What they're saying: Any big changes would likely need to go back before city voters in an advisory referendum before any action is taken, says Thad Williamson, a politics professor at University of Richmond who is leading the commission.

• Williamson stresses that these are all still just ideas.

What's next: The commission is scheduled to make a recommendation to the council by the end of July.

• Until then, it's soliciting feedback via an online survey.