A Phoenix City Council frontrunner's conflict of interest concern
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

Ed Hermes is running for Phoenix City Council in District 4. Photo: Zach Buchanan/Axios
Phoenix City Council candidate Ed Hermes is also a partner at the largest law firm in the state, and if elected, he'd have to navigate significant conflict of interest concerns.
Why it matters: Hermes' firm, Snell & Wilmer, regularly has business involving the city — including lawsuits against it — and Hermes wouldn't be able to participate as a councilmember in anything involving his employer.
State of play: Hermes is considered the frontrunner in a crowded race to represent District 4 — he's raised the most campaign cash and has the most prominent endorsements.
- He's a non-equity partner at Snell, where he's worked since 2018, per his LinkedIn, and has served on the Osborn School District Governing Board and a city advisory committee.
What they're saying: Hermes tells Axios that he'll comply with city ethics guidelines around conflict of interest and recuse himself from both Snell work involving the city and council work involving Snell.
- "I will avoid any sort of perceptions of conflict," he says, adding that such conflicts are "not going to be something that comes up much."
Reality check: The day Hermes spoke with Axios, a Snell lobbyist spoke on behalf of a client during a council hearing on the city's major "Rio Reimagined" project in South Phoenix.
- After the lobbyist's remarks, Mayor Kate Gallego noted that the city had been in court a day earlier defending itself in a lawsuit brought by Snell on behalf of a data center client.
Zoom in: Snell has 13 registered lobbyists representing more than 260 clients, per its latest disclosure with the city.
- According to records reviewed by Axios, Snell has represented clients in matters voted on by the council at least eight times since the start of 2025.
Friction point: Even if Hermes follows every state and city ethics guideline, he can't fully dispel the perception of a conflict of interest, says Joan McGregor, the director of ASU's Lincoln Center of Applied Ethics.
- Plus, anyone with an interest before the council could simply hire Snell to nullify Hermes' vote.
- "It just seems like all the way around a bad idea to have somebody like that running for City Council," McGregor tells Axios.
The intrigue: If a councilmember does commit an ethical violation, it's unclear what would become of it.
- Ethics complaints are investigated by the city ethics commission, which is currently down a member and so requires a unanimous vote from the remaining four to send a complaint to the council.
- The commission hasn't sent the council a single complaint in its history.
- If it did, it requires seven of nine council votes — or, if a complaint involves a councilmember, seven of the remaining eight — to accept the recommendation and impose sanctions.
What's next: Voting continues through Nov. 3.
- If no candidate receives more than 50% — likely, given the expanded field — the top two finishers will advance to a March runoff.
