Ohio mapmakers head back to the drawing board
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Brendan Lynch/Axios
Between missed deadlines, partisan votes and gerrymandered draft maps, the Ohio redistricting process has gone less than ideally so far.
- The latest Ohio Supreme Court ruling that the revised state legislative maps need to be re-drawn again shows there is still more work to be done as the primary election fast approaches.
Why it matters: Without official maps in place, Ohioans don't know which legislative districts they'll be voting in and who they will be represented by starting in 2023.
- Likewise, candidates don't know which district boundaries to campaign within.
The time crunch: Early voting for the May primary election is supposed to begin in five weeks for military and overseas voters.
Catch up quick: The redistricting commission passed new state legislative maps last year, but the court threw them out and ordered members to try again.
- The Republican majority redrew the maps without support from Democrats and the court ruled this week they, too, are unconstitutional.
- With the commission headed back to the drawing board, Ohio redistricting is starting to feel like Groundhog Day.
Between the lines: The foremost issue continues to be proportionality, or the number of Democratic- and Republican-leaning seats a map is expected to produce based on Ohio's voting breakdown.
- Republicans win around 55% of the vote in Ohio Statehouse elections, but the court has dinged the maps drawn to give the GOP a higher percentage of seats.
Meanwhile, a separate process for redrawing the 15 congressional districts for the U.S. House of Representatives is similarly in flux.
- The court rejected a GOP-drawn map giving the party up to a 13-2 seat advantage and a new one is being drawn.
💠Our thought bubble: The redistricting reforms enacted by voters were designed to encourage maps drawn in a bipartisan, transparent and timely manner.
- The process included contingency plans should this system go awry, apparently for good reason.
- In a paradoxical way, these back-and-forth and at times chaotic developments show the reforms are working as designed — to prevent gerrymandering, no matter what it takes.
The bottom line: If the May 3 primary election is happening as scheduled, which one legislative leader says is the plan, mapmakers have to move quickly.