Question 2 puts Mass. public defenders' fight on the ballot
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
In the Nov. 3 election, Massachusetts voters will decide whether public defenders under the Committee for Public Counsel Services can unionize.
Why it matters: Blue Massachusetts once again finds itself putting a union fight to a referendum, this time affecting the quality — and likely the cost — of legal representation for people who can't afford one in criminal cases.
- Indigent legal representation costs taxpayers, but it's also constitutionally required.
How it works: CPCS, a 43-year-old independent agency under the state judicial branch, oversees public defenders, but their salaries are set by state lawmakers.
- Lawmakers also determine compensation for bar advocates, private attorneys contracted by CPCS to help when their caseload overwhelms their small staff.
- Staff attorneys have tried multiple times without avail to join the state employees union, only to get blocked by state courts.
State of play: Like a previous ballot measure on rideshare drivers, a yes vote wouldn't create a union, but it would allow public defenders to form one.
- The measure would explicitly name CPCS, not the Legislature, as the attorneys' employer, meaning the union would negotiate certain terms with CPCS. (These rights wouldn't apply to bar advocates.)
- The option to unionize would come as CPCS adds some 300 new staff attorneys, following a 2025 law granting $40 million to double the staff.
Catch up quick: The push for higher pay and resources came to a head last year when bar advocates stopped taking cases to protest their current pay rates, shifting piles of cases to public defenders.
- The Legislature ultimately approved funding to hire more CPCS attorneys and increase pay for bar advocates, but not before the work stoppage triggered 2,345 hearings for defendants who were jailed for over a week without legal representation.
- Those Lavallee hearings resulted in 1,689 dismissed cases and the release of 213 defendants.
Friction point: CPCS staff attorneys are required to handle at least 20% of indigent caseloads.
- An Office of the Inspector General report in June states CPCS staff attorneys haven't met that threshold in the last 10 years and, if they had, they could have avoided last year's Lavallee hearings.
- The CPCS, however, told MassLive that the OIG tracked staff attorneys' and bar advocates' assignments differently, relating to a "basic measurement problem" that "understated staff work for years."
The other side: There's no opposition campaign challenging the proposal, but some have raised questions about unintended consequences.
- Union contracts could limit the agency's ability to respond quickly to fluctuating caseloads and other demands, opponents said during a legislative hearing earlier this year.
- Unionization could also complicate efforts to ramp up productivity to address concerns raised in the OIG report, per an independent report from the Tufts Center for State Policy Analysis.
The fine print: Even if CPCS workers get collective bargaining rights, state law puts a ceiling on their compensation.
- Their pay must remain comparable to what attorneys in district attorneys' offices make, per the CSPA.
What we're watching: Even if the measure passes, lawmakers could still rework the legislation and slow-roll the law allowing unionization.