Trump asks judge to dismiss his hush money conviction

• Trump's legal team argued in the motion that prosecutors built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House, with evidence from conversations with Hope Hicks, his former top aide.

What they're saying: "No President of the United States has ever been treated as unfairly and unlawfully as District Attorney Bragg has acted towards President Trump in connection with the biased investigation, extraordinarily delayed charging decision, and baseless prosecution that give rise to this motion," Trump's attorneys wrote in the filing.

Thought bubble, via Axios' Sam Baker: Trump's request is probably a reach: The $130,000 in hush-money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels all occurred before Trump was president — making them difficult to characterize as official acts, and prosecutors presented plenty of evidence from non-White House personnel.

• That said, the boundaries of the Supreme Court's immunity ruling haven't been tested yet.

Where it stands: Trump's sentencing, originally scheduled for July 11, was pushed back to Sept. 18 as his lawyers seek to have his criminal conviction tossed.

Read the filing in full, via DocumentCloud:

Go deeper: Trump leans on presidential immunity ruling in new bid to toss Jack Smith