Sign up for our daily briefing

Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Denver news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Des Moines news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Tampa Bay news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Charlotte news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios

The success of T-Mobile's long-fought-for bid to acquire Sprint is about to come down to whether a federal judge believes that the deal will boost or harm competition.

Why it matters: The FCC has approved the deal and the Justice Department has settled with the companies, leaving this case, in which 14 state attorneys general have sued to block the merger, as the primary remaining obstacle.

What the states say: Going from four national wireless carriers to three will inherently and necessarily reduce competition, eventually resulting in higher prices, particularly for low-income consumers.

What T-Mobile says: The company has been a disruptor in wireless, ending 2-year contracts and other consumer-unfriendly practices and forcing others to follow suit. There are actually more competitors today, including the cable companies and companies like Tracfone, while terms of the Justice Department's settlement ensure that Dish Network will emerge as another viable competitor.

Wild card: One of the biggest flashpoint is likely the Dish question. To settle with the Justice Department, T-Mobile agreed to a multipart deal in which it will:

  • Sell Sprint's prepaid brands (Boost, Virgin and Sprint Prepaid) to Dish Network, giving the company roughly 9.5 million subscribers.
  • Make available at least 20,000 cell sites to Dish.
  • Divest some spectrum in the 800-MHz range to Dish.
  • Provide Dish with "robust access" to the T-Mobile network for at least 7 years while Dish builds out its 5G network.
  • engage in "good faith" negotiations about leasing some of Dish's existing 600 MHz spectrum.

As a result, T-Mobile says Dish will be able to hit the ground running in a way that no challengers have ever been able to.The states, meanwhile, argue in a court filing that T-Mobile should not be allowed "to proceed with an anticompetitive merger based on the hope that Dish will one day grow into a viable wireless company equal to a competitor that already exists today."

Between the lines: There is certainly truth in both sides' arguments, and a lot hangs on how the court imagines the competitive landscape will look in a couple of years, with or without this deal.

  • It's also worth noting that while 14 states are going to trial against the deal, led by New York, a number of states have dropped out, including Texas and Nevada, which have settled with T-Mobile.

My thought bubble: T-Mobile's own success is one of the biggest hurdles in its case. It's tough to argue that it hasn't thrived as a smaller rival given it has led the industry for years in gaining customers. And a lot of T-Mobile's strongest moves came after regulators scuttled AT&T's bid to buy T-Mobile. That said, Sprint is clearly struggling, and the economics of building a nationwide network with fewer customers are tough.

What's next: The case in U.S. District Court in New York is expected to last 2-3 weeks.

Go deeper:

Editor's note: This story has been corrected to indicate that after acquiring Sprint's brands, Dish Network will have 9.5 million subscribers (not 9.5 billion).

Go deeper

The rebellion against Silicon Valley (the place)

Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Smith Collection/Gado via Getty Images

Silicon Valley may be a "state of mind," but it's also very much a real enclave in Northern California. Now, a growing faction of the tech industry is boycotting it.

Why it matters: The Bay Area is facing for the first time the prospect of losing its crown as the top destination for tech workers and startups — which could have an economic impact on the region and force it to reckon with its local issues.

Erica Pandey, author of @Work
53 mins ago - Economy & Business

Telework's tax mess

Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios

As teleworkers flit from city to city, they're creating a huge tax mess.

Why it matters: Our tax laws aren't built for telecommuting, and this new way of working could have dire implications for city and state budgets.

Wanted: New media bosses, everywhere

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Reuters, HuffPost and Wired are all looking for new editors. Soon, The New York Times will be too.

Why it matters: The new hires will reflect a new generation — one that's addicted to technology, demands accountability and expects diversity to be a priority.