October 02, 2023
Welcome back to another week. Today, we have a look at how conservative health policy experts are urging policymakers to go slow regulating AI in health care while the Biden administration weighs taking executive action.
- We'll be back in your inbox tomorrow ā earlier, if there's breaking news.
1 big thing: Conservatives sound alarm on policing AI
Illustration: Tiffany Herring/Axios
A group of conservative health policy experts are urging Congress and the Biden administration to pump the brakes on any rush to regulate AI ā a contrast with the bipartisan push to put guardrails around the technology, Axios' Caitlin Owens reports.
Why it matters: Congress may or may not be able to pass anything on AI at the end of the day, but the Biden administration is deeply interested in executive action and is expected to issue an executive order within weeks.
Driving the news: In an open letter, the newly formed AI Healthcare Working Group argues that "the Administration and Congress are proposing regulations that benefit large market incumbents ... at the expense of start-ups. These proposals are at odds with fundamental liberties and threaten to stifle innovation in healthcare."
- "If regulation is deemed necessary, it should be narrowly tailored to promote competition and innovation, provide clarity to consumers and companies, and protect patient safety and privacy," the group adds.
- The group is co-founded by Joe Grogan, a former director of the Domestic Policy Council in the Trump administration, and Naomi Lopez, a senior fellow at the Goldwater Institute.
Between the lines: The letter specifically warns against the formation of a dedicated AI regulatory agency, at least in health care. It's an idea that's been picking up steam.
- The concerns expressed echo some included in a white paper by Senate HELP Ranking Member Bill Cassidy released last month.
- "Top-down, all-encompassing frameworks risk entrenching incumbent companies as the perpetual leaders in AI, imposing an artificial lid on the types of problems that dynamic innovators of the future could use AI to solve," the paper argues.
- It also discusses AI's potential in areas like the research and development of new drugs, detection and treatment of disease and lessening providers' workload.
What's next: The Senate will hold its second AI insight forum sometime this month, Sen. Todd Young recently told our Axios Pro Policy colleague Ashley Gold.
- But for all of the interest, getting anything across the finish line will be a massive lift.
2. Catch me up: Drug price talks, lab-developed tests
Illustration: Natalie Peeples/Axios
Here's what caught our eye over the weekend:
1) Medicare drug negotiations: A conservative judge turned away one of the pharmaceutical industry's main arguments against drug price negotiations in the Inflation Reduction Act.
2) Lab-developed tests: The FDA rolled out a plan to regulate lab-developed tests for COVID-19 and other conditions that have long escaped close agency scrutiny as Congress drags its feet on the issue.
3) Medicare Advantage algorithms: The U.S. is reining in how Medicare Advantage plans use predictive technology to make coverage decisions.
4) SCOTUS' new term: Early cases in the Supreme Court term beginning today could advance conservatives' years-long push to curb the federal bureaucracy ā and to undercut core Democratic priorities, including regulating health care.
ā Thank you for reading Axios Pro Policy, and thanks to editors Adriel Bettelheim and David Nather and senior copy editor Bryan McBournie.
- Do you know someone who needs this newsletter? Have them sign up here.
View archive

