Federal science cuts could threaten California wildfire forecasts
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

More cuts to federal science programs could threaten weather forecasts crucial to predicting wildfire behavior.
Why it matters: Much of the West saw a dry, warm winter. In California, extreme swings between wet storms and prolonged dry spells have become increasingly common — an early sign that fire risk could be elevated this summer.
Zoom in: Cal Fire has warned that the state is facing an early and prolonged peak fire season, spurred by the unusual March heat wave.
- Forecasters say El Niño-driven storms can be a double-edged sword. While they ease drought conditions, they can also spur brush growth that later becomes tinder during hot, dry summers.
- While peak fire season typically runs from June through October, this year's activity has been off to an early start with roughly half a dozen fires in central and Southern California alone burning more than 1,000 acres in May.
Between the lines: Forecasting work depends on federal labs like National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and CIRES, which have already faced Trump administration funding cuts and proposed reductions.
- Researchers operate as an "ecosystem," CIRES associate director Jen Kay told Axios. Losing tools like NCAR's supercomputing center would affect projects at multiple labs, she said.
What they're saying: "All of that infrastructure comes from the federal government," Kay added. "If you cut NOAA by 50%, you cut the quality of the forecast you get on your phone by 50%."
Reality check: One or two fires often account for roughly 90% of the acreage burned in a season, making rapid fire growth predictions more important than predicting the number of fire starts, per Janice Coen of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).
What's next: Uncertainty is already affecting researchers' work. "You don't know what projects will continue, you don't know what people will be there," Kay said.

