Why bronze feels better
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Despite their better performances, Olympic silver medalists seem less happy than their bronze-winning peers, according to a 2021 study by University of Iowa professors.
Why it matters: The findings highlight how expectations can dampen or elevate our self-perception.
State of play: The Iowa researchers gathered hundreds of photos of Olympians from 2000 to 2016 and used AI to document muscle movements and facial expressions like smiles.
What they found: Even though the second-place finishers performed better, the analysis found that bronze medalists often appeared happier on the podium.
The intrigue: The phenomenon occurs because of "counterfactual thinking" — a psychology term that refers to imagining different outcomes or "what could have been," Andrea Luangrath, a UI marketing professor and study coauthor, tells Axios.
- A silver medalist is more likely to compare themselves to the gold medalist and engage in "upward comparison."
- But the bronze medalist compares themselves to the athletes who didn't make the podium, a "downward comparison," Luangrath tells Axios.
- "They're just thinking, 'I'm glad I'm on the podium at all,'" she says.
The big picture: This isn't an experience exclusive to ultra-competitive athletes.
- Everyone engages in "second-place" thoughts comparing themselves to others, Luangrath says.
The bottom line: The study is a lesson in being mindful of whom you compare yourself to — and having more reasonable expectations for yourself.
- "There will always be someone who is faster, smarter, stronger, wealthier," Luangrath says.
- "Just revel in the happiness of the moment — and maybe not so much the outcome."