U.S. Supreme Court upholds urban camping ban targeting homeless

Catch up quick: The SCOTUS case stems from a 2018 lawsuit filed on behalf of the homeless population in Grants Pass, Oregon.

• It targets a local law banning people from sleeping in parks or using sleeping materials to set up living spaces. It allowed authorities to ticket or jail people in violation.
• Lawyers representing the plaintiffs said the law violated the Constitution's clause prohibiting "cruel and unusual punishment."

Driving the news: The high court's decision says enforcing laws regulating camping on public grounds doesn't violate the Constitutional clause against cruel and unusual punishment, per SCOTUSblog.

• The court's conservative majority sided with the city, 6-3, with Justice Neil Gorsuch writing the majority opinion.

Zoom in: Denver's law bans unauthorized camping on public and private property, meaning people need permission to stay there, per 5280.

The other side: Homeless advocates have repeatedly called for a camping ban repeal and for Denver to stop encampment sweeps, which they say further displace people without sheltering options.

• However, under Mayor Mike Johnston's administration, sweeps are usually conducted only when housing or sheltering is available to people being removed.
• Still, critics say this strategy hasn't solved the city's homelessness crisis.