Sign up for our daily briefing

Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Denver news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Des Moines news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Tampa Bay news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Charlotte news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

With new attacks by President Trump, high-stakes testimony next week on Capitol Hill, and a midterm election vulnerable to online manipulation, tech’s giants are bracing themselves for two months after Labor Day that could decide whether and how much the government regulates them.

The big picture: The companies — led by Facebook and Google but with Twitter, Apple, and Amazon also in the mix — are caught in a partisan vise, between privacy-oriented critics on the left who fear further election interference and newer charges from the right of anti-conservative bias and censorship.

We spoke with people at the big companies to map the cases they expect to make publicly and privately.

Facebook

The message: We’re at the table. We’re willing to accept some regulation. We don’t have all the answers.

Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg will testify at the Senate Intelligence Committee's hearing next week on disinformation. The company is now seasoned in the art of congressional testimony thanks to previous appearances by several executives, most notably CEO Mark Zuckerberg last spring.

  • Its strategy in recent months has been to adopt a more open public posture compared to its initial circle-the-wagons response in 2016, including on-the-record press briefings touting its election protection work and the disclosure so far of two coordinated disinformation campaigns.
  • The company says it will work with the intelligence community to protect the midterms, but that those agencies are responsible for answering questions about who is behind disinformation campaigns.
Google

The message: Our algorithms have no politics.

Google had been less in the spotlight than Facebook or Twitter even though it probably has more data on users and operates YouTube, which has struggled to limit conspiracy theories and other questionable content. That, of course, changed with Trump's recent tweets.

  • Unlike its rivals, Google has so far resisted sending a C-level executive to next week's congressional hearings.
  • In response to Trump's repeated charges that its search engine is biased against conservative news and views, the company insists that neither its code nor its engineers are discriminating against any political perspective.
  • Many conservatives remain dissatisfied, a new survey shows, and feel that social media in general "censors" their point of view.
Twitter

The message: We’re listening to users and working with the authorities. We’re being more transparent about political ads. And we’re cracking down on fake accounts.

Twitter updated its ads policy Thursday to include a certification process for advertisers and more visibility into issue ads.

  • Like Facebook, it created an archive of political ads that will be logged through a “transparency center” so that people can see who’s spending on the platform.
  • It has also been purging millions of accounts to weed out fakes, bots and dormant users.
  • Twitter has been more transparent with law enforcement officials and the public about flagging coordinated misinformation attacks.
Apple

The message: We don't sell your info. We don't have a social network. We're pro-privacy.

Unlike Google and Facebook, Apple isn’t dependent on advertising revenue, so it’s able to stand apart from rivals and say that it’s not stockpiling user data and it’s not a vector for election tampering.

  • Another Apple talking point: In the company’s chief business, selling phones and computers, it has no monopoly power. So when the talk of antitrust regulation gets hot and heavy in DC, the company argues that it should be left out of the discussion.
Amazon

The message: We don’t do elections. We're not a social network. We pay fair wages.

Amazon has been largely insulated from concerns over election meddling and malicious content, but nonetheless has a lot at stake over the next two months.

  • A privacy debate spurred by Google and Facebook would also implicate Amazon and its massive cache of consumer data.
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders has been putting pressure on the company over conditions in its warehouses.
  • A White House-inspired task force is examining the president’s evidence-free charge that the U.S. Postal Service is suffering from Amazon’s business.

The company has largely laid low, but on Wednesday it publicly blasted Sanders for making "misleading accusations against Amazon."

The bottom line: The companies are all adopting different versions of a “we’re different from all the others” strategy, and that could let aggressive legislators divide and conquer them on the road to regulation.

Editor's note: This story has been corrected to note that Amazon made its statement about Sen. Bernie Sanders’ criticism on Wednesday, not Thursday.

Go deeper

Dion Rabouin, author of Markets
8 mins ago - Economy & Business

Biden's inflation danger

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

President-elect Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion stimulus proposal has economists and bullish market analysts revising their U.S. growth expectations higher, predicting a reflation of the economy in 2021 and possibly more booming returns for risk assets.

Yes, but: Others are warning that what's expected to be reflation could actually show up as inflation, a much less welcome phenomenon.

Ina Fried, author of Login
2 hours ago - Technology

CES was largely irrelevant this year

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Forced online by the pandemic and overshadowed by the attack on the Capitol, the 2021 edition of CES was mostly an afterthought as media's attention focused elsewhere.

Why it matters: The consumer electronics trade show is the cornerstone event for the Consumer Technology Association and Las Vegas has been the traditional early-January gathering place for the tech industry.

The FBI is tracing a digital trail to Capitol rioters

Illustration: Sarah Grillo

Capitol rioters, eager to share proof of their efforts with other extremists online, have so far left a digital footprint of at least 140,000 images that is making it easier for federal law enforcement officials to capture and arrest them.

The big picture: Law enforcement's use of digital tracing isn't new, and has long been at the center of fierce battles over privacy and civil liberties. The Capitol siege is opening a fresh front in that debate.