Maybe we don't need as much oil
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Analysts are starting to wonder if the world needs less oil than they thought it did when the Iran war started.
Why it matters: Decades ago, a global oil shock triggered permanent changes to the structure of the global economy, and signs are now emerging that it's happening again.
The big picture: Higher gas prices driven by the war are accelerating a global transition to electric vehicles — especially in China and Europe — and are helping stave off the deeper economic pain that past energy crises have created.
- "History suggests that past oil shocks often left lasting declines in gasoline demand, and this episode may prove no different," commodity analysts at JPMorgan recently wrote.
The latest: After falling on reports that the U.S. had negotiated a deal to end the war, oil prices rose sharply Monday as those hopes evaporated.
Zoom in: Globally, retail prices for gas are up 28% from this time last year, and up 33% for diesel, Goldman Sachs analysts said in a note Sunday night.
- That has decreased demand for gasoline and diesel, as well as for petrochemicals and jet fuel.
The intrigue: Such "demand destruction," as economists like to call it, hasn't brought an anticipated economic slowdown, analysts at both Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan noted.
- That's partly because consumers have options: People are switching to electric vehicles in Europe and, especially, in China.
- In the rest of Asia, demand has fallen as governments encourage more remote work, as well.
- The rise of EVs and work-from-home technology has "increased switching opportunities," Goldman analysts wrote.
By the numbers: In March, "around 30 countries" had record-breaking monthly EV sales, per the IEA.
What they're saying: "We spent last week in China, and the most striking takeaway from our meetings was not simply that oil demand has fallen," JPMorgan commodity analysts said in a research note last week. "It was that it may have dropped by as much as 9% ... abruptly, unexpectedly and with remarkably little visible disruption."
- The oil shock in Europe, they wrote, has been "oddly" more manageable than in 2022 — helped by EV adoption and surges in solar and wind power.
For example: The Chinese government estimates that during a five-day holiday in May, EVs accounted for nearly a quarter of all vehicles on the road — up 33% from last year.
- Demand for jet fuel in China is also down, as more Chinese people are traveling by high-speed rail domestically.
Zoom out: Almost half the oil used today is for road transport, climate journalist Bill Spindle noted on Substack.
- If the war drags on, the incentive to switch to EVs will only grow, he argued.
Reality check: Certainly, the oil shock hasn't been painless. Southeast Asia, in particular, has been hammered by rising prices.
Flashback: The modern-day energy system was built following the 1973 oil crisis — countries and businesses worked to become more fuel efficient.
- In the U.S., it led to the creation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the founding of the Department of Energy and fuel economy standards.
- The national speed limit was established as a way to reduce gas usage.
What to watch: This time could spark an even more radical shift.
- Put more wonkishly: The war is leading to "the steady decoupling of economic activity from oil consumption itself," JPM analysts wrote.
Between the lines: Under President Trump, the U.S. has backed away from efforts to push toward EVs and renewable energy — and could be at a disadvantage as these changes accelerate.
Thought bubble via Axios national energy correspondent Amy Harder: One reason the decoupling is happening is because we've already gone through all the lowest-hanging fruit and taken oil out of the economy where possible.
- If there is a move away from oil this time, it will have to be more radical.
