Democrats get "chippy" in Michigan's crowded U.S. Senate primary
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Shoshana Gordon/Axios
Thursday's Michigan Democratic Senate debate showed why party insiders are so nervous about holding retiring U.S. Sen. Gary Peters' seat.
Why it matters: Democrats agree Michigan is essential for retaking the Senate, but they have a trio of well-funded candidates tearing each other apart ahead of the Aug. 4 primary.
- After Ken Paxton's runoff win this week over Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Senate Majority Leader John Thune's Republicans are recalibrating spending and strategy nationally around protecting seats in states President Trump won comfortably.
- That includes Texas, which Trump carried by roughly 1.6 million votes.
😬 But this afternoon's debate on Mackinac Island is a reminder that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's Democrats have their internal differences to resolve in a state Trump carried by 80,000 votes.
- "It is messy. Messier than I would have liked," Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) told AP about the primary.
- "Unfortunately, people are getting a little chippy in the race," the retiring Peters (D) told AP.
🤖 Zoom in: AI and AIPAC produced the most pointed exchanges in today's debate.
- "I'm the only candidate who didn't ask AIPAC for their support," said former public health official Abdul El-Sayed.
- "I'm the only candidate on this stage who big AI super PACs are not going to be spending money on behalf of."
- He called to "regulate AI and AI corporations as public utilities."
🤑 State Sen. Mallory McMorrow and U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens focused more on electability and the GOP's likely nominee, former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers.
- "There is a path for Democrats to take back control of the U.S. Senate, but it is not without Michigan," McMorrow said. She called for "a token tax on commercial use of AI to fund apprenticeship programs."
- "It's not enough," El-Sayed responded, arguing that Democrats need to think bigger about the threat AI poses to workers, consumers and government itself.
- Stevens largely stayed out of the AI fray, framing the issue instead in terms of industrial competition and economic growth.
📢 The intrigue: The clash over AIPAC and campaign money became even more personal.
- El-Sayed accused outside pro-Israel groups of shaping the race itself. "It absolutely would not shake my perception — it's AIPAC money," he said.
- He later escalated the attack after moderators asked Stevens directly what campaign money "buys."
- El-Sayed interjected: "Just not answering the question."
🥊 McMorrow answered more of El-Sayed's contentions than Stevens did.
- "I have not taken a dime of corporate PAC donations. I have not taken a dime of AIPAC donations," she said.
☢️ Between the lines: The three agreed on nuking the filibuster, though Stevens raised eyebrows by incorrectly saying that removing it would have allowed Democrats to block the One Big Beautiful Bill Act from becoming law.
