House Oversight holds Clintons in contempt of Congress in Epstein probe
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attend the inauguration of President Trump on Jan. 20, 2025. Photo: Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images
The House Oversight Committee voted Wednesday to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas tied to its probe into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Why it matters: Contempt — a rarely used congressional enforcement tool —carries a maximum penalty of up to one year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000. But the vote is only the first step: the full House must still approve the measure before it can be referred to the Justice Department for prosecution.
- The vote was 34-8 to hold Bill Clinton in contempt, with nine Democrats voting in favor and two voting "present."
- On the vote to hold Hillary Clinton in contempt, the vote was 28-15, with only three Democrats voting in favor and one voting "present."
- The panel rejected a Democratic amendment to hold Attorney General Pam Bondi in contempt for delaying the release of the Epstein files.
Driving the news: The former president and former secretary of state failed to appear for depositions last week, prompting Oversight Republicans to pursue contempt proceedings.
- Negotiations to secure Bill Clinton's testimony collapsed Tuesday after Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) rejected a proposal that would have allowed the former president to appear in New York without an official transcript, and without the full committee present.
- "The Clintons' latest demands make clear they believe their last name entitles them to special treatment," Comer wrote in a statement Tuesday.
- "The absence of an official transcript is an indefensible demand that is insulting to the American people who demand answers about Epstein's crimes," he continued.
- Angel Ureña, Bill Clinton's deputy chief of staff, denied that Clinton refused a transcript, writing on X, "If that were the last or only issue, we'd be in a different position. You keep misdirecting to protect you-know-who and God knows what."
Between the lines: Oversight Democrats fumed that the contempt votes were hyper-partisan, but they also wanted to draw a stark contrast with Republicans' unwavering defense of President Trump.
- "It seems like Comer is selectively enforcing subpoenas," Rep. Emily Randall (D-Wash.) told Axios' Andrew Solender last week. But, she added, "I don't think anyone should be able to avoid sharing information with the committee."
Catch up quick: The Clintons were issued subpoenas in August, along with former FBI director James Comey and other government officials.
- The depositions were initially set for October, then pushed to December after Bill Clinton said he needed to attend a funeral.
- In December, Comer agreed to delay the depositions a second time at the Clintons' request but said in a letter at the time that the Clintons' attorney was "unwilling to provide any alternative dates."
- Comer ultimately rescheduled the depositions for last week without confirmation that the Clintons would appear.
State of play: The Justice Department in December released the first tranche of Epstein-related files, which included multiple photos of Bill Clinton.
- Both Clintons have denied any wrongdoing.
- Bill Clinton also traveled aboard Epstein's plane during Clinton Foundation trips in the early 2000s, before Epstein was charged with sex crimes.
Flashback: Penalties in contempt of Congress cases can range from symbolic rebukes to jail time.
- Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro were sentenced to prison for defying subpoenas from the Democratic-led Jan. 6 select committee.
- Former Attorney General Merrick Garland was held in contempt in 2024 for refusing to turn over audio of President Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur, but the Biden-era DOJ declined to prosecute the case.
What's next: If the resolution garners the simple majority needed for passage in the House, DOJ will have to decide whether to pursue criminal charges.
- The House is not expected to take up the resolution this week, a source familiar with the matter told Axios.
Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional reporting.
