White House defends inspectors general firings by citing Supreme Court ruling

• The law states a 30-day notice must be given to Congress in writing before firing an inspector general — which did not happen with the Trump dismissals.

What she's saying: Asked about the firings in her first White House press briefing, Leavitt said it's the belief of the White House and the White House Counsel's Office that Trump was within his executive authority to do so.

• "He is the executive of the executive branch, and therefore he has the power to fire anyone within the executive branch that he wishes to," she said.
• She indicated the firings were done through a memo sent out by the White House Presidential Personnel Office.

Zoom in: Leavitt said the White House rests the legality of the firings on the Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau case that went before the Supreme Court in 2020.

• The court ruled the president can generally remove executive officers but with two exceptions, one which requires Congressional oversight and the other for so-called "inferior" federal officers who don't have policymaking or administrative authority.

Between the lines: During his first term, Trump often clashed with and ousted IGs, prompting Congress to pass a law in 2022 requiring presidents to provide them with 30 days' notice and a "substantial rationale" for such firings.

• Trump defended his actions over the weekend, telling reporters, "Some people thought that some were unfair or some were not doing their job. And it's a very standard thing to do."

Zoom out: Trump continued with more controversial removals this week, firing the acting chair of the National Labor Relations Board, the general counsel of the labor board and the three Democratic members of a top independent intelligence review board.

• He's also wiped nearly all of the government's cybersecurity and surveillance advisers from its roster.

Go deeper: Scoop: Top House Dems plot first big battle with Trump