Arizona county officials' hand-count ballots order blocked by judge

Driving the news: Arizona Alliance of Retired Americans and a Democratic voter who sued to stop the planned hand-count said in a statement that while hand counts are "an important tool for recounts or confirming machine accuracy, using them as a primary counting method can add human error and inaccurate standards into the process."

• Pima County Superior Court Judge Casey McGinley ruled that the Cochise County board of supervisors exceeded their statutory authority — noting there's "no evidence" that electronic tabulation is inaccurate, nor that "the audit system established by law is insufficient to detect any inaccuracy it may possess."
• McGinley noted that counties are legally required to "randomly" select ballots for recount, but this is not possible if all all ballots are selected.
• "Because the statute does not permit elections officials to begin the precinct hand-count by counting all ballots cast, the Board's requirement that elections officials do so here is unlawful," McGinley said.

Background: McGinley oversaw the Cochise County case following a request for a judge who wasn't from that county, the Arizona Republic reports.

Go deeper: New Arizona law could mean more recounts