Mar 15, 2017

2008 vs 2016: How campaigns use data to profile and persuade voters

Greg Ruben / Axios

Before our lives turned digital, campaigns relied on field workers doing door-to-door interviews and calling landlines to survey voters about their personal characteristics and political preferences. They'd use that data to inform their advertising strategies — which typically revolved around major TV buys. Now, Americans spend nearly 6 hours per day consuming digital media( up to 50 minutes per day on Facebook alone), creating troves of data about their internet behavior, emotional biases and consumer habits.

Why it matters: As Americans spend more time online, campaigns are able to build more precise pictures of voters to augment old mainstays, like field data, state voter files and census information. Because the majority of experts (campaign flacks, media members, pollsters, etc.) failed to accurately predict 2016 election outcomes, a growing emphasis is being placed on how best to allocate resources between scrubbing, double-checking and supplementing traditional voter file data with the online tools that grow more sophisticated every year.

Changing habits:

In 2008, U.S. adults spent more time with TV per day than on digital platforms. By 2012, time spent by U.S. adults on digital per day exceeded TV, but desktop-only internet users still exceeded mobile. In 2016, mobile-only internet users exceeded desktop and video viewership on smartphone devices had outpaced desktop. These trends can largely be attributed to the steady increase in smartphone ownership, broadband access and social media use from 2008-2016.

Data: Pew Research Center; Chart: Andrew Witherspoon / Axios

Campaigns adapted by changing the ways they collect data and target potential voters:

In 2008, voter files were mostly based on data comprised from email and field work, and contained information about personal characteristics (age, sex, income, occupation, etc), not consumer-based internet data. The internet was mostly used for fundraising, not persuading voters, which was still done through direct mail, email marketing, and TV. Facebook, YouTube and other highly-targetable social platforms were not major advertising distributors (YouTube didn't launch pre-roll ads until after the election).

In 2012: Voter files began to incorporate data from nascent digital outreach and ad efforts. Campaigns began matching offline data with online data to hyper-target ads. Video had just become a viable element of social media advertising and organic messaging. Candidates had sizable social media presences on a variety of platforms, include Spotify, Pinterest, and Instagram — none of which existed in 2008.

By 2016, Voter files were created with digital modeling tools that could predict which voters were likely persuadable or more easily mobilized based on internet consumption data. "Lookalike" audiences, (digital traits of people that resemble those you are targeting) were used to broaden and enhance targeting capabilities. Facebook and Google become primary campaign advertising platforms that allowed campaigns to use narrow audience-targeting tools to very acutely reach certain voters.

What's next: Campaigns are going to keep refining their tactics for reaching specific types of voters while also reaching as broad of a related audience as possible. The RNC, for example, maintains a voter file of not just every registered Republican, but of everyone of voting age in the country — and campaign operatives are even gathering data on younger teenagers to figure out who to register first.

Go deeper

Vox Media launches new privacy-focused ad-targeting platform

Vox Media chief revenue officer Ryan Pauley. Photo: James Bareham/Vox Media

Vox Media announced Monday the launch of Forte, a new ad-targeting data platform designed to help advertisers reach Vox's monthly audience of 125 million consumers efficiently — without using shady data practices to target them.

Why it matters: It's Vox Media's first big commercial announcement since it merged with New York Media last year, and it comes amid regulatory changes and an industry reckoning around data privacy in advertising.

Go deeperArrowDec 30, 2019

How Iran's disinformation threat differs from Russia

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

America "needs to be prepared for retaliation in the hard cyber space and soft information space" after killing Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, says a top expert at the Atlantic Council.

Why it matters: Iranian influence operations to-date have been different than other state-backed disinformation campaigns, particularly from Russia.

Tech's biggest upcoming battles in 2020

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

The most consequential stories for tech in 2020 pit the industry's corporate colossi against the U.S. government, foreign nations, and the human needs of their own customers.

Why it matters: Today's tech giants own and operate the informational hubs that increasingly shape our public and private lives. That's putting their products and policies under greater scrutiny than ever before.