Get the latest market trends in your inbox
Stay on top of the latest market trends and economic insights with the Axios Markets newsletter. Sign up for free.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Minneapolis-St. Paul
Tampa-St. Petersburg news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa-St. Petersburg
Russian President Vladimir Putin hands President Donald Trump a World Cup soccer ball at their summit on July 16, 2018, in Helsinki. Photo: Chris McGrath via Getty Images
President Trump humiliated himself in the press conference that followed his meetings with Russian president Vladimir Putin — there's little argument about that. His comments on election meddling have produced a storm of outrage. But were they a significant win for Putin?
The big picture. It’s right to be appalled by Trump’s performance. Yet after Russian officials are done gloating, they may find the results a little disappointing.
As a forum for problem-solving, the summit was a near-total dud, without even limited steps forward on Ukraine, Syria or nuclear arms control. Both presidents mentioned small examples of this kind — from humanitarian relief in Syria to meetings of CEOs and some sort of unspecified coordination in global energy markets. All those issues now await discussions between senior advisers.
Yes, but: Even that prospect looks iffy. The overwhelming criticism of Trump’s comments will inevitably complicate the follow-up. The Russian government wants re-admission to Western polite society, with official contacts at all levels becoming routine and, above all, legitimate. Now all those in the Trump administration, national-security bureaucracy, Congress, and GOP establishment who have harbored doubts about Trump's affinity for Putin will have more room to maneuver.
What to watch: All the items on the Trump-Putin to-do list will now have to run a bureaucratic gauntlet. Don’t look for urgency. Bilateral discussions, when they occur, will have a narrower agenda. Congressional disapproval will be felt.
The bottom line: Moscow commentators have been saying they thought Trump finally had the support he needed to open a new phase in relations. They’re now likely to see he has further isolated himself.
Stephen Sestanovich is a professor of international diplomacy at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and the author of “Maximalist: America in the World from Truman to Obama.”