Illustration: Lazaro Gamio/Axios

A new plan for regulations released by the U.K.. government Monday puts legal responsibility on tech companies for any harmful or unlawful content that appears on their properties. This means tech giants can face big fines if they don't remove things like terrorist videos or hate speech in a timely fashion.

Why it matters: If passed, the proposed laws would force tech companies to operate with much more rigor when policing content on their properties. While the law only extends to the treatment of content within the U.K., it could have major implications for how tech companies operate and are regulated globally.

The details: The proposed regulations would apply to any company that allows users to share or discover user-generated content or interact with each other online.

  • That means the rules would apply to most of the internet's biggest players, including social media sites like Facebook, public discussion forums like Reddit, messaging services like WhatsApp, and search engines like Google or Bing.
  • The plan includes a mandatory "duty of care" provision, which requires companies to take reasonable steps to tackle illegal and harmful activity on their services.
  • It calls for even stricter requirements for companies to take tougher action around content related to terrorism, child sexual exploitation and abuse.
  • It also demands that companies make it easier for users to file complaints and makes it mandatory for them to submit annual transparency reports, something many companies do already.
  • The plan calls for a new, independent regulator with powerful enforcement tools to oversee the enforcement of the new laws. "We are consulting on powers to issue substantial fines, block access to sites and potentially to impose liability on individual members of senior management," the plan says.

The big picture: The appointment of an internet regulator is notable because it addresses a problem that many countries around the world have been grappling with. Since most government structures were created before the internet existed, it's often difficult to determine which existing government body should manage internet regulations.

Be smart: Such sweeping measures, if passed, would likely set an international standard for how tech companies should be policed.

  • Right now, a similar dynamic is playing out globally around privacy. Europe passed a major privacy law in May 2018 that the U.S. and other countries are looking at when building models for their own privacy policies.
  • Europe has taken the lead on policing tech companies on many issues ranging from privacy to competition to trade. Just last week the EU passed a major copyright law that require sites like Facebook and Google to pay a fee when they summarize news stories and link to them.

Yes, but: If the rules are as far-reaching as proposed, it's conceivable that some global internet companies would simply write off their U.K. presence rather than comply.

What's next: A 12-week consultation on the proposals begins Monday, and will be followed by final proposals for actual legislation.

  • The proposal comes against the backdrop of Britain's huge Brexit crisis, which could threaten Prime Minister Theresa May's hold on power as it continues to split the nation's political parties.

Bottom line: U.K. regulators say they're doing this because they want to make the internet safer for all people online, especially kids. But without government intervention with big tech platforms, the government doesn't think that is possible.

“The era of self-regulation for online companies is over."
— UK Digital Secretary Jeremy Wright in a statement

Go deeper

Updated 21 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 10 a.m. ET: 31,361,979 — Total deaths: 965,642— Total recoveries: 21,528,674Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 10 a.m. ET: 6,859,117 — Total deaths: 199,911 — Total recoveries: 2,615,949 — Total tests: 95,841,281Map.
  3. Health: The CDC's crumbling reputation — America turns against coronavirus vaccine.
  4. Politics: Elected officials are failing us on much-needed stimulus.
  5. Business: Two-thirds of business leaders think pandemic will lead to permanent changes — Wall Street fears stimulus is doomed.
  6. Sports: NFL fines maskless coaches.

Mitt Romney says he'll support moving forward with Supreme Court pick

Photo: Greg Nash/AFP/Pool via Getty Images

Mitt Romney announced Tuesday that he would support moving forward with a Senate vote on President Trump's selection to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Why it matters: Barring any big surprises, Democrats have virtually no shot at stopping the confirmation process for the president’s nominee before November’s election.

Trump says he will announce Supreme Court pick on Saturday

Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump tweeted Tuesday that he plans to announce his Supreme Court pick on Saturday.

Why it matters: Republicans are moving fast to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which would tilt the balance of the high court in conservatives' favor and have lasting impact on climate policy, immigration and the Affordable Care Act. Judge Amy Coney Barrett, who met with the president this week, is a frontrunner for the job.

Get Axios AM in your inbox

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!