The agreement between the UAE and Israel that will be signed on Tuesday mentions the Palestinian issue and the two-state solution as part of a reference to previous agreements which were signed, UAE minister of state for foreign affairs Anwar Gargash told me in a Zoom briefing.

Why it matters: Gargash’s comments gave the first substantive details from the agreement which up to now remained completely secret. The UAE pushed back on criticism against the agreement, with Israel stressing the deal will also help the Palestinians.

  • Gargash said in the briefing that the agreements with Israel will give the UAE and also Bahrain “real leverage” over Israel and will allow both countries to make it clear to Israel that it needs to compromise and have a more rational policy on the Palestinian issue.
  • He added the UAE received clear commitments from Israel and the U.S. that there will be no West Bank annexation for a long period of time. “The Palestinians should take advantage of the situation and reengage – an empty chair policy will not bring any results," he said.

Gargash said that the Palestinian issue will be mentioned in the preamble while the rest of the agreement will deal with bilateral issues like the opening of embassies, trade and tourism.

  • “We broke the psychological barrier. This was the hard part and now we want to move forward towards a warm peace," he stressed.  

The ceremony today will include signing on three different documents, U.S. officials said:

  1. The first is the “Abraham accords declaration” which will be signed by Trump, Netanyahu and the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain. The declaration will focus on the intentions of all the parties to promote peace in the region.
  2. The second document will be a “peace declaration” between Israel and Bahrain – a general document short of an agreement which will include a commitment by both parties to draft a peace treaty.
  3. The third document will be the Israel-UAE peace treaty. The treaty will come into force only after a vote in the Israeli cabinet and in the Israeli Knesset.

Behind the scenes: Netanyahu was notified by the Israeli attorney general several hours before the ceremony that he has no authority to sign the agreement with the UAE, because according to Israeli law only the foreign minister or a minister which he gave power of attorney can sign bilateral agreements with other countries.

  • In the middle of the night Israeli foreign minister Gabi Ashkenazi, one of Netanyahu’s biggest political rivals, had to go over the agreement and consult with lawyers until he finally sent Netanyahu a letter giving him authorization to sign the agreement.

Go deeper

Sep 23, 2020 - World

U.S.-Sudan talks on normalization with Israel end without breakthrough

Negotiations in Abu Dhabi between the U.S. and Sudan have ended without a breakthrough on Sudanese recognition of Israel, sources briefed on the talks tell me.

The big picture: Sudan is trying to re-engage with the world economically as it transitions from the dictatorship of Omar al-Bashir, and needs U.S. sanctions relief to do so. The U.S., meanwhile, has pushed Sudan to become the latest Arab country to normalize relations with Israel. The talks in Abu Dhabi, first reported by Axios, were the most substantive to date on that topic.

Trump's 2 chilling debate warnings

Photo: Morry Gash/Pool via Getty Images

One of the few groups in America with anything to celebrate after last night's loud, ugly, rowdy presidential "debate" was the violent, far-right Proud Boys, after President Trump pointedly refused to condemn white supremacist groups.

Why it matters: This was a for-the-history-books moment in a debate that was mostly headache-inducing noise. Trump failed to condemn racist groups after four months when millions marched for racial justice in the country's largest wave of activism in half a century.

Ina Fried, author of Login
40 mins ago - Technology

Candidates go online to cut through debate noise

Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

While President Trump and Joe Biden fought to be heard in a rowdy debate Tuesday, both campaigns sought to draw digital battle lines and occupy online turf they could have all to themselves.

The big picture: Trump's impulsive Twitter style made a shambles of the debate format, but online the candidates were able to find niches where they couldn't be interrupted — and could motivate their supporters to donate, organize and turn out to vote.