Thomas Farr at a hearing last year. Screenshot via the Senate Judiciary Committee website.

Senate Republicans are weighing a floor vote this week on one of President Trump’s lifetime judicial nominees, Thomas Farr, whose record of supporting election policies that have been struck down by federal courts as racially discriminatory has sparked concern among Democrats and a coalition of civil rights and progressive groups.

Driving the news: Farr, a Raleigh-based attorney who would serve as a District Judge in North Carolina if confirmed, has previously come under fire for helping craft a voter ID law that a lower court determined was passed to target black voters with "almost surgical precision.” Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court decided against taking up an appeal by North Carolina Republicans. Farr had also defended the state’s legislative and congressional maps, some of which the Supreme Court ruled as illegal racial gerrymandering.

Details: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that all 49 Democrats are opposed to the nomination. And on Monday, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) doubled down on his pledge to vote against all judicial nominees unless Majority Leader Mitch McConnell allows a floor vote on legislation to protect special counsel Robert Mueller. Flake had supported Farr earlier this year during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s vote.

  • This means that Democrats could derail the nomination if another Republican decides to oppose Farr.

Flashback: Over the summer, Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) sank Judge Ryan Bounds' nomination to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals amid outrage over his racially insensitive writings in the past.

  • But Rubio's spokesperson Olivia Perez-Cubas told Axios on Tuesday that the senator will vote in support of Farr.
  • Scott, the lone black Republican in the Senate, declined to say whether he would support the judge, telling CNN’s Manu Raju: “I'm doing my homework.”

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) defended Farr earlier this year, saying that the nominee “has been the subject of a coordinated and viciously dishonest smear campaign from the far-left designed to tank his confirmation.”

  • And Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) told reporters on Monday that he’s optimistic the Senate will confirm him.

Go deeper:

Go deeper

Ben Sasse emerges as GOP Trump critic ahead of November

Sen. Ben Sasse walks to the Senate from the subway to vote in June. Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) has dialed up his spicy slams of President Trump, including this swipe at yesterday's signing ceremony: "The pen-and-phone theory of executive lawmaking is unconstitutional slop."

Why it matters: Trump increasingly looks — to business and to fellow Republicans — like a loser in November. So they're more likely to create distance to save their own skins. Sasse also won his May primary, further freeing him.

Pelosi: "States don't have the money" for Trump's unemployment order

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed on "Fox News Sunday" that states don't have the funds to comply with the executive order President Trump signed on Saturday, which requires them to cover 25% of an additional $400 in weekly unemployment benefits.

Why it matters: Many state and local governments have had their budgets devastated by the economic impacts of the coronavirus, which have caused expenses to soar and revenues to plunge.

Kudlow says he regrets claiming Trump couldn't use executive order for unemployment

White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday that he regrets suggesting this week that unemployment benefits can only be extended by Congress.

Why it matters: President Trump's decision to bypass Congress to sign four executive actions, including one that provides $400 per week in extra unemployment benefits, has prompted outcry from Democrats and even some Republicans who believe he is overstepping his constitutional authority.