The congressional to-do list​: everything

Illustration: Lazaro Gamio / Axios

Congress left town after passing the GOP tax bill, but left much else unresolved — meaning its already long to-do list over the next couple of months is even worse than expected.

The bottom line: The first items on the agenda will be immigration, a government spending bill and a budget caps deal, health care, and an expiring surveillance program.

January:

  • Spending caps: Appropriators are still trying to reach a deal on discretionary and defense spending levels. Democrats don't want to raise defense spending caps without an equal increase in domestic spending.
  • Immigration: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters before recess that, if there's a bipartisan agreement that the administration also supports, legislation addressing DACA, or people brought to the U.S. illegally as children, will be taken up by the Senate. It would also likely include some kind of border security measure.
  • Surveillance: The major Section 702 surveillance law — used by the intelligence community to justify warrantless surveillance of electronic communications of foreign nationals located abroad —expires in mid-January, thanks to a short-term extension Congress passed before leaving for the holidays. That debate pits hard line intelligence hawks against people like Sen. Rand Paul and Sen. Ron Wyden, who have threatened a filibuster when faced with the prospect of a long-term extension of the law. In the middle are lawmakers who are pushing for light reforms that won't satisfy the privacy advocates.
  • Health care: Sen. Susan Collins, in exchange for supporting the tax bill, was promised a vote on both her reinsurance bill and the Alexander-Murray bill funding cost-sharing reductions. She didn't get either in December, and will be looking for both to be part of the must-pass government funding bill this month.
  • Government funding: Once again, we're facing a shutdown if Congress doesn't pass a spending bill, this time by Jan. 19. If Congress gets a spending caps deal in time, then we're likely looking at a more thorough spending bill. If not, they'll probably have to pass another temporary continuation of current funding levels.
  • Disaster relief: Lawmakers from Texas and Florida, both hit hard by hurricanes last year, are anxious to pass a multi-billion disaster relief package.

Beyond that, Congress still has to address:

  • The Children's Health Insurance Program: Funding officially expired at the end of September, and it wasn't until December that Congress passed a short-term funding continuation (although states hadn't yet run out of money). But a longer-term solution still must be found, including ways to pay for it.
  • The debt limit: The "extraordinary measures" being used to pay the country's bills are likely to run out sometime in the spring, and then Congress will have to act to raise the debt limit. This could be the last and greatest leverage point for House conservatives upset about all the money being spent.
  • Extension of expired tax credits: There's been a lot of chatter about these happening in January, but they can also be made retroactive, giving Congress more time. There will surely be a strong push to delay some Affordable Care Act taxes, if they aren't addressed in a spending bill. The energy world is also watching these.Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, just before the break, floated a bill covering energy efficient homes and buildings, biodiesel, geothermal energy, fuel cells and much more.Hatch's proposal also extends the availability of a production tax credit for new nuclear power projects, which is important for utility giant Southern Company's efforts to complete a delayed, over-budget reactor project in Georgia. Another provision boosts credits for carbon capture and storage initiatives.

Wild cards that could complicate an already-chaotic agenda:

  • Iran: After the Trump administration's decision to decertify the Iran deal, Congress may choose to add new sanctions — which would almost certainly scuttle the agreement.
  • FY2019 budget/reconciliation: Congressional Republicans may try to pass a 2019 budget, which is routine. However, there's a huge outstanding question of whether the budget will include reconciliation instructions and whether those instructions would start the process of partisan welfare reform, Speaker Paul Ryan's preferred agenda. However, McConnell has said he doesn't think welfare and entitlement reform should be done on a partisan basis.
  • Infrastructure: The administration and McConnell want to pass an infrastructure package, but a plan hasn't been released, and any significant package will cost a lot of money — following the GOP's $1.5 trillion-dollar tax bill.

What's next

New York Times endorses Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for president

Democratic presidential candidates Sens. Elizabeth Warrenand Sen. Amy Klobuchar at the December 2020 debatein Los Angeles. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The New York Times editorial board has endorsed Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for president, in a decision announced on national television Sunday night.

Why it matters: The board writes in its editorial that its decision to endorse two candidates is a major break with convention that's intended to address the "realist" and "radical" models being presented to voters by the 2020 Democratic field.

Go deeperArrow1 hour ago - Media

What's next in the impeachment witness battle

Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Senators will almost certainly get to vote on whether or not to call impeachment witnesses. The resolution laying out the rules of the trial, which will be presented Tuesday, is expected to mandate that senators can take up-or-down votes on calling for witnesses and documents.

Yes, but: Those votes won't come until the House impeachment managers and President Trump's defense team deliver their opening arguments and field Senators' questions.

Inside Trump's impeachment strategy: The national security card

White House counsel Pat Cipollone and acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Trump officials say they feel especially bullish about one key argument against calling additional impeachment witnesses: It could compromise America's national security.

The big picture: People close to the president say their most compelling argument to persuade nervous Republican senators to vote against calling new witnesses is the claim that they're protecting national security.