Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
A new Brookings Institution paper outlines ways to prevent patients from receiving surprise medical bills — particularly the patients who are unlikely to know their doctor is out-of-network.
The big picture: The paper argues that any solution must take into account that health care settings often are not normal markets.
- Patients either aren't in a position to make choices (like in an emergency room), or don't have a choice of doctor (like anesthesiologists or radiologists in a hospital).
Details: The paper recommends 2 fixes:
- States could cap out-of-network provider rates in these situations, limiting patients' cost-sharing to what they'd normally pay for in-network services.
- Separate billing would be banned for out-of-network doctors at in-network facilities. Insurers would instead pay the hospital a certain amount and then that facility would pay providers for their services.
Go deeper: Why ending surprise medical bills is harder than it looks