Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Stay on top of the latest market trends
Subscribe to Axios Markets for the latest market trends and economic insights. Sign up for free.
Sports news worthy of your time
Binge on the stats and stories that drive the sports world with Axios Sports. Sign up for free.
Tech news worthy of your time
Get our smart take on technology from the Valley and D.C. with Axios Login. Sign up for free.
Get the inside stories
Get an insider's guide to the new White House with Axios Sneak Peek. Sign up for free.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Want a daily digest of the top Denver news?
Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Want a daily digest of the top Des Moines news?
Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Want a daily digest of the top Twin Cities news?
Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Want a daily digest of the top Tampa Bay news?
Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Want a daily digest of the top Charlotte news?
Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
Matt Rourke / AP File Photo
Republicans in Congress are barreling ahead to overturn FCC privacy rules opposed by a rare union of broadband providers and internet companies. A vote is expected today.
The rules adopted by the FCC last fall require broadband providers to first get permission from their customers before sharing or selling sensitive personal data to advertisers and other third-parties. Rolling back the rules would be a victory to both broadband providers (like AT&T and Comcast) and internet companies (like Google and Facebook). Why? Because getting rid of the rules makes it easier to use consumer data, including web-browsing and app-use habits, to target ads.
Why it matters: Online advertising is a primary revenue stream for web companies and a growing one for ISPs. The $72 billion online advertising market is expected to grow to more than $113 billion by 2020, according to eMarketer. Right now that market is dominated by companies like Google and Facebook, but broadband providers also want a piece of that pie and say nixing the privacy rules would help them compete against the more established web players.
Here's what it means...
For broadband providers: AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, Charter and other ISPs have access to an enormous amount of data about their customers, including online browsing history. Right now (since the rules haven't actually gone into effect yet), they don't have restrictions on collecting that data and sharing it with others, as long as consumers haven't specifically told them not to. They have long argued that the rules, which only applied to ISPs, put them at a disadvantage when trying to compete with established tech giants for ad revenue.
For web companies: Google, Facebook, Yahoo and other online platforms dominate the online advertising market. The FCC's rules didn't apply to them, but their industry trade groups opposed the rules because it opens the door to regulations in the consumer data arena.
For advertisers: The major advertising groups, from the Association of National Advertisers to the Data and Marketing Association, are cheering. Striking the rules means less red tape for a big business partner— the ISPs.
For consumers: Since the rules haven't taken effect, consumers won't notice much difference. But privacy advocates say consumers need more control over how their data is used, and view Congress's actions as a major setback.
What's next: If the Senate signs off on the resolution to overturn the rules, it will move over to the House. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune said Wednesday evening that, even though some of his House colleagues have not always been as adamant about moving forward, his "assumption is that once we move it here the pressure will start to build on them to move it over there."