What they're saying: Washington reacts to Mueller's public statement

Donald Trump in the Oval Office. Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images

Former special counsel Robert Mueller's public statement on Wednesday announcing the end of his investigation set off a chorus of reactions around Washington as 2020 Democratic candidates called for impeachment and President Trump tried to spin it as a win in a tweet.

"Nothing changes from the Mueller Report. There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed! Thank you."

Reality check: Trump's interpretation is not at all what Mueller said. The former special counsel said that if his office "had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime," it would have said so, adding that charging Trump was never even an option under Justice Department guidelines.

What they're saying:

  • White House press secretary Sarah Sanders: "After two years, the Special Counsel is moving on with his life, and everyone else should do the same."
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “The Congress will continue to investigate and legislate to protect our elections and secure our democracy. The American people must have the truth. We call upon the Senate to pass H.R. 1, the For The People Act, to protect our election systems."
  • House Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.): "Given that Special Counsel Mueller was unable to pursue criminal charges against the President, it falls to Congress to respond to the crimes, lies and other wrongdoing of President Trump — and we will do so."
  • House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff: "We look forward to Mueller's testimony before Congress. While I understand his reluctance to answer hypotheticals or deviate from the carefully worded conclusions he drew on his charging decisions, there are, nevertheless, a great many questions he can answer that go beyond the report, including any counterintelligence issues and classified matters that were not addressed in his findings."
  • Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.): "[F]or me, the case is over. Mr. Mueller has decided to move on and let the report speak for itself. Congress should follow his lead."
  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.): "Mr. Mueller's statement also makes clear that Congress has a right—we believe an obligation—to continue our constitutionally mandated oversight without interference or stonewalling and follow the facts wherever they may lead."
  • Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.): The only congressional Republican to support impeachment action against Trump tweeted, "The ball is in our court, Congress."
  • Ranking member of House Oversight Committee Jim Jordan: "9 minute and 39 second press conference. Same conclusions. No new information. Time to move on."
  • House Homeland Security Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.): "I support impeachment. The President has egregiously obstructed justice. The Special Counsel did not give any indication that the President is innocent. I take Robert Mueller at his word: 'If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.' Therefore, it is time for Congress to perform its oversight duties."
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who supported impeachment after the release of the Mueller report: "Mueller’s statement makes clear what those who have read his report know: It is an impeachment referral, and it’s up to Congress to act. They should."
  • South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D): "This is as close to an impeachment referral as you could get under the circumstances."
  • Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Tex.): "There must be consequences, accountability, and justice. The only way to ensure that is to begin impeachment proceedings."
  • Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.): "Robert Mueller’s statement makes it clear: Congress has a legal and moral obligation to begin impeachment proceedings immediately."
  • Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.): "Mueller did his job. Now it’s time to do ours. Impeachment hearings should begin tomorrow."
  • Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.): "It's time for Congress to begin impeachment hearings and follow the facts. Robert Mueller clearly expects Congress to exercise its constitutional authority and take steps that he could not. We can't let the president defy basic accountability measures built into our Constitution."

Go deeper: Explore a detailed view of the Mueller report

What's next

New York Times endorses Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for president

Democratic presidential candidates Sens. Elizabeth Warrenand Sen. Amy Klobuchar at the December 2020 debatein Los Angeles. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The New York Times editorial board has endorsed Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for president, in a decision announced on national television Sunday night.

Why it matters: The board writes in its editorial that its decision to endorse two candidates is a major break with convention that's intended to address the "realist" and "radical" models being presented to voters by the 2020 Democratic field.

Go deeperArrow1 hour ago - Media

What's next in the impeachment witness battle

Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Senators will almost certainly get to vote on whether or not to call impeachment witnesses. The resolution laying out the rules of the trial, which will be presented Tuesday, is expected to mandate that senators can take up-or-down votes on calling for witnesses and documents.

Yes, but: Those votes won't come until the House impeachment managers and President Trump's defense team deliver their opening arguments and field Senators' questions.

Inside Trump's impeachment strategy: The national security card

White House counsel Pat Cipollone and acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Trump officials say they feel especially bullish about one key argument against calling additional impeachment witnesses: It could compromise America's national security.

The big picture: People close to the president say their most compelling argument to persuade nervous Republican senators to vote against calling new witnesses is the claim that they're protecting national security.