Axios Markets

August 26, 2026
🐪 Wednesday! Stock futures are little changed this morning as investors await the PCE report, the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge, at 8:30am ET.
In today's edition: You know how everyone talks about the $1 trillion in AI buildout spending? The number might be three times as big. That's like more than three Elon Musks.
- Elsewhere in the AI world, Axios' Nathan Bomey has a preview of Nvidia earnings, out after the close today. And stick around for some musing on AI-generated writing by billionaires.
Shall we? In 1,161 words, a 4.5-minute read.
1 big thing: A $3 trillion baby
To paraphrase Justin Timberlake in his iconic turn in the 2010 film "The Social Network," a trillion dollars isn't cool. You know what is? $3 trillion.
The big picture: That's roughly how much money seven Big Tech companies, including Google, Microsoft and Nvidia, have committed to spending on AI-related infrastructure in off-balance-sheet commitments, according to a new analysis from Morgan Stanley.
- And that's on top of the estimated $770 billion in debt and lease obligations that are on the balance sheets.
Why it matters: The analysis finds that the total amount of spending on AI is much bigger than the already-mind-blowing headlines suggest, and — more of a red flag — it's more leveraged than is perhaps appreciated.
How it works: Off-balance-sheet commitments are essentially financial obligations that don't show up in a company's official tally of what it owns and owes — it's not an official debt but an obligation to pay someone something in the future.
Zoom in: Morgan Stanley looked at filings from the hyperscalers Google, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle and Amazon, as well as the chipmakers Nvidia and Broadcom and broke down their off-balance-sheet commitments.
- The hyperscalers have committed to $1.1 trillion in payments for data center leases that haven't yet begun.
- All seven companies have also agreed to buy $1.7 trillion of other stuff — purchase commitments for chips, memory and networking gear.
- These purchase agreements have ramped up this year — Google's commitments totaled $707 billion in the most recent quarter — from $72.5 billion in all of 2025, per the research.

Follow the money: This is future revenue for memory chipmakers like Micron Technology and help explain the phenomenal growth in that business.
The intrigue: These commitments are a jumping-off point for suppliers and data center developers who take that guarantee of future payments and use it to borrow more.
- Here's how the researchers explain it: "Suppliers and data center developers can borrow against long-dated leases, guarantees, or purchase commitments from investment grade hyperscalers, allowing capacity to be built before the hyperscalers make any payments or recognize liabilities."
Between the lines: What this essentially means is that Big Tech companies with decent credit ratings are leveraging that status to generate an absolute ton of lending that can be difficult to track.
Yes, but: Each of these companies is doing slightly different kinds of spending with different levels of risk.
- And it's not totally clear over what time period that $3 trillion gets spent — or if it gets spent. These are commitments, often contracts, but they could theoretically be renegotiated.
What to watch: At some point these obligations will start showing up on official balance sheets.
- By that time, will these investments be paying off? Timing is the question on investors' minds, says Todd Castagno, head of global valuation, accounting and tax at Morgan Stanley who coauthored the analysis. This is, after all, a new market.
- "It's like we are developing a car market without ever having seen the capabilities of car before, and everyone's going to get a car — and how do we finance it, and how do we know what that car is worth in five years?"
2. Nvidia takes the spotlight


Nvidia snapped a seven-day losing streak in the stock market yesterday. But its mini slump has raised questions over the AI darling's growth trajectory.
Why it matters: Nvidia is trying to use its massive pile of capital to keep the good times rolling — through a wide assortment of investments and capital deals (see above) — while continuing to feed the growing chip needs of the AI hyperscalers.
Zoom in: The company will report second-quarter earnings after the bell today, and investors want to see a blowout performance.
- Nvidia is expected to book $92.1 billion in revenue for the period, and more than $100 billion in the current third quarter, per S&P Capital IQ estimates. That would be its first 12-digit quarter.
- Q2 net income is estimated at $51.2 billion, with gross margins at 75%.
Friction point: Mounting bipartisan opposition to data centers — many of which draw substantial computing capacity from Nvidia chips — poses a threat to the company's continued momentum.
Yes, but: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has been moving to use the company's massive balance sheet to invest in AI companies and guarantee financing on deals like a sprawling ChatGPT data center slated for Ohio.
- "A lot of attention will also be paid to the off-balance-sheet activity," wrote Brian Mulberry, chief market strategist at Zacks Investment Management, noting that Nvidia has already made 66 investments totaling about $40 billion.
- Those investments have raised concerns about circular financing posing a systemic threat to the AI economy — concerns that Huang has roundly rejected.
The bottom line: The CEO will be under pressure to deliver a rosy outlook at a time when the public's support for AI is wobbling.
- "This shareholder meeting is now beginning to feel like the old Berkshire Hathaway events where people around the world would hang on every word that Warren Buffett had to say," Mulberry wrote.
3. A billionaire's flex
Legendary investor Stanley Druckenmiller may have made AI writing socially acceptable this week — at least for billionaires, telling NOTUS reporter Jeff Stein "of course" he used it to help draft a widely shared op-ed for the Wall Street Journal.
Where it stands: Among his intended audience in the financial world, Druckenmiller's article got more attention for its substance — a scathing critique of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — than for its style.
State of play: Fintwits not only seemed willing to overlook the method, but praised it:
- "Druck using AI to write the op-ed is the sickest burn of 2026," Claudia Sahm, a former economist for the Federal Reserve posted. "Didn't even waste his time writing up why Bessent was wrong."
- The WSJ's opinion page blessed the whole thing. "AI is a fact of modern life," WSJ opinion editor Paul Gigot said in a statement. "People will use it to assist in their work and writing, including with research, checking grammar, editing and more."
Between the lines: For the most part, plenty of billionaires already employ ghostwriters to spin up their op-eds, LinkedIn musings and social media posts.
- Transitioning to AI seems like a natural progression.
Madison Mills contributed reporting.
Thanks for reading! Get in touch at [email protected] and [email protected] or just reply to this one.
Thanks to Jeffrey Cane for editing and Carlin Becker for copy editing this edition.
Tell your friends to sign up here. You can also find Emily on X.com or Bluesky.
Sign up for Axios Markets





