Axios AI+

February 09, 2026
Ina here, incredibly excited to share the news that Madison Mills is moving to Axios' tech team and will be co-authoring AI+ with me. She brings incredible talent and financial expertise and gives us more resources to cover this pivotal moment. (More from her below.)
Today's AI+ is 868 words, a 3.5-minute read.
1 big thing: AI's $400 billion hit


AI is here — and investors lost over $400 billion to the realization that entire industries are on the cusp of being replaced.
Why it matters: The software-industry selloff, sparked by Anthropic's latest release, is ultimately just a baby step in a bigger transformation that may reshape how we all live and work.
- It's also the first tangible verdict on what happens when AI starts eating entire categories of work, well before the long-feared white-collar bloodbath even really begins.
Driving the news: Anthropic recently released a suite of software-killing tools — prompting investors to reconsider software companies' value, with the sector down 25%.
Zoom in: AI isn't just hitting software valuations, it's changing how these companies operate from the inside out.
- OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said he felt "useless" and "sad" using his own AI to code.
- Software engineers using the technology are also talking to each other less than ever, showing the "death of a community," Peter Coy writes.
The big picture: As of now, investors are seriously looking at AI not just as a productivity boost for software firms, but as a substitute.
- "AI is not just going to do something to labor ... it's going to do something to profits," Shelby McFaddin, portfolio manager of a $2.6 billion fund, tells Axios.
- One strategist likened it to BlackBerry: It survived, but its business model and valuation never recovered after being fully disrupted.
Yes, but: Some investors are still bullish on software stocks, especially now that they come at a discount.
- The winners could be companies offering software toolkits, rather than single-use apps.
- Software incumbents will also be hard to replace: "With AI, code may become cheap, but context is expensive ... you can't LLM your way past 10 years of customer data," Pitchbook noted in a report.
What we're watching: Stock prices are a bet, but sales are are the actual proof.
- Growth has already slowed for software names — and is a metric to watch for other industries that could be disrupted by AI.
- Customer retention will signal if people are switching to AI tools, David Fetherstonhaugh, EVP at VistaShares, tells Axios.
- Watch for the market to price in AI's broader labor hit across several industries in about a year-plus, McFaddin said.
What's next: Investors' fears about AI's impact on software companies could spread to other industries the emerging tech stands to disrupt.
The bottom line: Markets just ran the math on software in an AI world — and didn't like the answer.
2. AI legal advice is driving lawyers bananas
AI promises to make work more productive for lawyers, but there's a problem: Their clients are using it, too.
Why it matters: The rise of AI is creating new headaches for attorneys — they're worried about the fate of the billable hour, a reliable profit center for aeons, and are perturbed by clients getting bad legal advice from chatbots.
Zoom in: "It's like the WebMD effect on steroids," says Dave Jochnowitz, a partner at the law firm Outten & Golden, referring to how medical websites can give people a misguided understanding of their condition.
- "ChatGPT is telling them 'You got a killer case,'" Jochnowitz says.
- But the models don't understand the full context, the actual laws that apply or the full history of certain types of cases. They often give clients a false impression of what's possible, lawyers tell Axios.
- The disconnect "makes people not believe what you're saying," says S. Randall Hood, a personal injury lawyer and founder of McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips in South Carolina.
The big picture: AI is shaking up the legal world, but it's still early stages.
3. Exclusive: Senate candidate's plan for kids' online safety
Mallory McMorrow, a Democrat running for Senate in Michigan, is laying down a marker on kids' online privacy and AI as her primary race heats up, per an exclusive interview with Axios.
Why it matters: McMorrow, a state senator who currently leads polling in the Democratic primary, is among the first Democrats running for national office this year to roll out a comprehensive plan for kids' online safety.
What's inside: McMorrow's plan calls for:
- Banning cellphones in the classroom.
- Requiring social media platforms to have "privacy by default" settings for minors.
- Prohibiting social media providers from allowing users under age 14 to access features like "infinite scroll" and limiting push notifications.
- Prohibiting chatbots from representing themselves as licensed professionals.
4. Training data
- Moltbook was peak AI theater. (MIT Technology Review)
- Data centers are slated to account for a whopping 50%-ish of U.S. power demand growth the remainder of this decade. (Axios)
- A little-known Japanese firm, Nittobo, dominates production of a key glass fiber essential to advanced AI chips, creating a global supply bottleneck. (WSJ)
5. + This
I had a blast getting to watch the team figure skating competition this weekend rinkside, as I captured photos for Axios. This, of "Quad God" Ilia Malinin, was one of my favorites.
Thanks to Mackenzie Weinger for editing this newsletter and Matt Piper for copy editing.
Sign up for Axios AI+







