Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Just months after it announced the acquisition of Time Inc., Meredith Corporation, the Des Moines-based lifestyle magazine company, will lay off more than 1200 people, the company announced Wednesday.

Why it matters: With mergers of this size usually comes cost-cutting "synergies," which usually translate to layoffs. The company says positions are being eliminated in part to de-duplicate roles and to move more staff from Time Inc.'s former NYC headquarters to Meredith's Iowa headquarters, where operational costs are cheaper.

  • 200 employees have been notified that their positions have been eliminated.
  • Meredith said approximately 1,000 more positions will be eliminated over the next 10 months.
  • Meredith has roughly 3,600 employees. Time Inc. has roughly 7,200 employees. A 1,200-person layoff means a staff reduction of roughly 11%.

The company says these layoffs don't include any possible divestitures, and executives say it plans on selling several of its high-profile properties, including Time and Fortune.

  • Earlier Wednesday, Axios' Dan Primack reported that Meredith CEO Tom Harty told employees that there is a lot of inbound interest, primarily from wealthy individuals, but no private equity firms, and "it won't be someone like Condé or Hearst."
  • Sources also told Dan Primack that Harty noted Meredith is willing to sell any of the magazines alone, but thinks it's likely that Fortune and Money would go together.

Meredith said it will soon unveil a new brand-centered sales organization and "go-to-market strategy" that fully leverages its new powerful media portfolio, including its enhanced digital reach. The company says it will outline these new initiatives during all-employee meetings beginning March 28.

Background: Meredith Corp., the Iowa-based media company, bought Time Inc. for roughly $2.8 billion last November. Roughly a quarter of the deal value ($650 million) is being financed by Koch Equity Development (KED), the investment arm of Koch Industries, run by Republican mega-donors Charles and David Koch.

Our thought bubble: Backing from the Koch brothers initially prompted questions about the editorial independence of Time Inc.’s news properties, like Time Magazine and Fortune. The announcement of the sale of some of Time Inc.’s news properties suggests that isn’t a primary motivating factor.

Go deeper

Updated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 9:45 p.m. ET: 19,282,972 — Total deaths: 718,851 — Total recoveries — 11,671,491Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 9:45 p.m. ET: 4,937,441 — Total deaths: 161,248 — Total recoveries: 1,623,870 — Total tests: 60,415,558Map.
  3. Politics: Trump says he's prepared to sign executive orders on coronavirus aid.
  4. Education: Cuomo says all New York schools can reopen for in-person learning.
  5. Public health: Surgeon general urges flu shots to prevent "double whammy" with coronavirus — Massachusetts pauses reopening after uptick in coronavirus cases.
  6. World: Africa records over 1 million coronavirus cases — Gates Foundation puts $150 million behind coronavirus vaccine production.

Warren and Clinton to speak on same night of Democratic convention

(Photos: Abdulhamid Hosbas/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images, Sean Rayford/Getty Images)

Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton both are slated to speak on the Wednesday of the Democratic convention — Aug. 19 — four sources familiar with the planning told Axios.

Why it matters: That's the same night Joe Biden's running mate (to be revealed next week) will address the nation. Clinton and Warren represent two of the most influential wise-women of Democratic politics with the potential to turn out millions of establishment and progressive voters in November.

Trump considering order on pre-existing condition protections, which already exist

Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump announced on Friday he will pursue an executive order requiring insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions, something that is already law.

Why it matters: The Affordable Care Act already requires insurers to cover pre-existing conditions. The Trump administration is currently arguing in a case before the Supreme Court to strike down that very law — including its pre-existing condition protections.