Twin Cities restaurants are choosing "plant-based" over "vegan"
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
Their menus may not have meat or dairy, but Twin Cities restaurants are increasingly steering clear of the term "vegan."
What's happening: Though plant-based foods are growing in popularity, some businesses are shying away from marketing themselves as vegan because the term can have negative or off-putting connotations, Axios' Jennifer A. Kingson writes.
Why it matters: The two words aren't synonymous. Vegan tends to refer to an all-encompassing lifestyle free of animal products, while plant-based primarily refers to a more lenient diet that can still include dairy or honey.
What they're saying: The term "plant-based" is more inclusive and approachable to people who don't follow a strict lifestyle, therefore widening their customer base, restaurant owners told Axios.
- Francis Burger Joint's marketing avoids the word "vegan" to attract customers receptive to a meat-free version of a familiar food, but who might feel alienated by a vegan restaurant, co-owner Lindsey Johnston said.
Meanwhile: Plant-based café and wellness center Heal Mpls doesn't use it because it can insinuate the café serves processed foods like fake meat, owner Sierra Miller told Axios.
- "Our goal is to get veggies and whole ingredients on people's plates," she said.
The other side: Though Herbivorous Butcher is also patronized by omnivores, co-owner Aubry Walch said she has always felt strongly about using the word vegan because their products reflect the lifestyle.
- "People don't want to use it because it has negative connotations, but plant-based has become a watered-down term that can still allow for animal products. More care comes with 'vegan,'" she added.
Of note: Walch said she and her business partner and brother Kale took over restaurant J. Selby's in January, but they kept the space's existing "plant-based" marketing because it's what customers were used to.
The big picture: No matter the terminology, the goal remains the same — to save more animals and reduce meat consumption, Johnston added.