Dems use "vote-shaming" to increase turnout
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
A leading Democratic super PAC is looking to boost young voters' turnout in November through a public pressure campaign, reminding them it's a matter of public record whether individuals cast a ballot or sit out the election, Axios’ Lachlan Markay reports.
Why it matters: Studies have shown "vote shaming" can be an effective strategy to increase voter participation. Priorities USA's approach uses digital ads and social media to reach more than 8 million young people who are newly eligible to vote this year.
Driving the news: "Who you vote for is secret,” says one of the ads posted last month on social media. "But whether you decide to cast a vote or not is public. So keep making your community proud this November."
Zoom in: San Francisco voter turnout in even years, when we vote for the president and/or congressional representatives, is typically higher than odd-numbered years. In November 2020, for example, voter turnout was 86.3% compared to 41.6% in November 2019, when residents elected Mayor London Breed.
- San Francisco has a ballot measure this November that would move the scheduled 2023 elections for mayor, sheriff, district attorney, city attorney and treasurer to 2024, and every four years thereafter.
- Called the Voter Participation Act, the ballot measure aims to increase turnout for local elections.
What they're saying: "This will probably double — maybe even more — voter turnout," Supervisor Dean Preston, who sponsored the measure, told the San Francisco Examiner.
The other side: Breed has called the measure a power grab, saying Democratic Socialists "want to change elections in San Francisco in order to have more control and power."
What we're watching: Voter turnout in San Francisco's handful of highly competitive midterm races, including the one for district attorney, school board and District 6 supervisor.