Axon's license plate cameras divide public opinion
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Nearly two dozen speakers on Monday evening offered contrasting views on a controversial contract for a new automated license plate reader camera operator in Denver.
Why it matters: The feedback indicates public opinion is divided. Supporters siding with Mayor Mike Johnston's administration say Axon is a valuable police tool, while opponents characterize the cameras as mass surveillance.
State of play: The one-hour public hearing wasn't required but hosted by the council as a courtesy, reflecting the public interest in the proposed one-year contract for 50 automated cameras.
Zoom in: Johnston's policy director Tim Hoffman said these types of cameras assisted in over 40% of all homicide investigations in Denver last year and recovered more than 400 cars since 2024.
- Axon's cameras would be installed at fewer than 20 locations along major corridors and arterial streets, Hoffman noted.
What they're saying: The 23 public speakers were split nearly equally between supporters and opponents.
- Backers cited public safety for approving the contract, with at least one speaker calling it "life-saving" technology.
The other side: Those who oppose the contract say the cameras can infringe on constitutional rights and the data collected could be vulnerable to breaches.
The intrigue: One speaker who pushed back against the contract said the bulk of the evening's attendees — including those in an overflow room — oppose the Axon contract; one supporter said he felt he was "outnumbered."
- The Party for Socialism and Liberation's Denver chapter urged the public to "flood city council" and voice dissent in an email on Sunday.
What's next: Councilmember Kevin Flynn delayed a final vote until next Tuesday to give the council more time to make a decision.