Cleveland City Council pumps brakes on the "Close Burke" hype train
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Maura Kearns/Axios
Cleveland City Council begins a series of public hearings Wednesday on whether to close Burke Lakefront Airport, and one of its leaders says the decision is more complicated than local rhetoric suggests.
Why it matters: Mayor Justin Bibb wants Burke closed as soon as the end of this year.
- But council, which must approve the decision, is signaling it wants answers before aggressive timelines or splashy renderings drive the debate.
What they're saying: Councilman Charles Slife, chairman of the transportation committee, hopes the hearings will inject realism into a conversation he believes has become overheated.
- "There's a lot of eagerness around lakefront development and closing Burke," he tells Axios. "But I don't think the public has really been given all the ins and outs of why that's easier said than done."
Between the lines: Slife says the debate has hardened into two camps, and that both oversimplify the stakes.
- Supporters of closure often overstate how easy it would be to redevelop the 450-acre site and how much usable lakefront it would unlock, Slife argues.
- Opponents, meanwhile, exaggerate Burke's importance to regional aviation, he says.
Reality check: Slife believes neither side has focused enough on the practical realities: regulatory barriers, environmental conditions, infrastructure costs and long-term impacts on the city budget.
- "We get excited by renderings," he says. "But the basic question is: Is this prudent? Can we afford it?"
Follow the money: Burke currently operates as an enterprise fund and runs at about a $1 million annual loss, subsidized through airline fees at Hopkins that add pennies to passengers' tickets.
- Slife warns that redeveloping Burke could shift ongoing costs to the city's general fund, competing with basic services like police, fire and park maintenance.
- "I'm not interested in vague claims about regional growth," he says. "I want to know how this affects Cleveland's budget."
What's next: The hearings, which run through April 15, will examine:
- Legal and environmental hurdles to development
- Budget impacts and city subsidies
- The federal path — and cost — to closing an airport
- And whether Northeast Ohio's market can absorb 450 acres of new development.
The bottom line: Slife is open to closure, but not without proof that it strengthens Cleveland in the long run.
- "What's the saying? 'Trust your mother, but cut the cards.'"