Photo: Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images

The three drug companies that control the insulin market have seen their net sales climb over the past 12 years even as they have had to agree to bigger discounts, according to an Axios analysis of insulins sold by Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi.

The big picture: Drug manufacturers have largely blamed the broken insulin market — where many people with diabetes are rationing their medication — on other actors within the supply chain. But insulin makers have still been able to collect more money overall and retain their power over the market.

Expand chart
Data: Company documents; Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios

By the numbers: Net global insulin sales, after accounting for rebates, rose by at least 80% from 2008 through 2019 for each of the big three companies.

  • There's a lot of variation in sales by brand (see all of them).
  • For example, revenue from Sanofi's Lantus fell in 2016, after its patent expired and CVS and UnitedHealth excluded it from their coverage lists. Sales shifted to a competitor, Eli Lilly's Basaglar.

Between the lines: Revenue is a function of price and quantity, and both have risen.

  • Insulins' list prices have gone up drastically over the past two decades. List prices matter a lot for the uninsured and people with less generous health plans.
  • Net prices have not increased as much, and for some insulins they have dropped, because pharmacy benefit managers have extracted higher discounts, called rebates, in exchange for giving certain insulins preferred coverage status.
  • The growing prevalence of diabetes has led to higher insulin use, but outside data shows total prescriptions and daily insulin use have grown modestly over the past several years. Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi all declined to say how many insulin vials and pens they have sold.

The intrigue: Insulin sales are rising even though many of the drugs' patents have expired.

  • Humalog, NovoLog and Lantus all lost patent protection over the past several years. Their revenues have dipped, but they still generate more than $2.5 billion each in net sales.
  • Patents for Humulin and Novolin expired more than 15 years ago, but they still generate more than $1 billion each in net sales.
  • Even though some patents have lapsed, developing cheaper insulins is difficult and costly, and the incumbent players are fighting regulatory agencies to delay competition.

What they're saying: Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi submitted statements but did not address some questions about their net sales.

  • Eli Lilly attributed higher sales to more people getting diagnosed with diabetes.
  • Novo Nordisk said "a lot of factors like increase of prevalence" contributed to higher sales.
  • Sanofi focused on its lower net price and lower sales in recent years, but not factors that led to higher sales over time.

The bottom line: Discounts and price negotiations have inconvenienced, not fundamentally hurt, insulin makers. And patients, along with the public, are footing the bills.

Go deeper

Caitlin Owens, author of Vitals
27 mins ago - Health

The coronavirus is starting to crush some hospitals

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

Some states are seeing dangerous levels of coronavirus hospitalizations, with hospitals warning that they could soon become overwhelmed if no action is taken to slow the spread.

Why it matters: Patients can only receive good care if there's enough care to go around — which is one reason why the death rate was so much higher in the spring, some experts say.

Scoop: The Lincoln Project is becoming a media business

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

The Lincoln Project is looking to beef up its media business after the election, sources tell Axios.

Driving the news: The group recently signed with the United Talent Agency (UTA) to help build out Lincoln Media and is weighing offers from different television studios, podcast networks and book publishers.

Trump, Biden strategies revealed in final ad push

Data: Bully Pulpit Interactive; Chart: Danielle Alberti/Axios

President Trump is pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into Facebook ads on the Supreme Court and conservative judges in the final stretch of his campaign, while Joe Biden is spending over a million on voter mobilization, according to an analysis by Axios using data from Bully Pulpit Interactive.

The big picture: Trump's Facebook ad messaging has fluctuated dramatically in conjunction with the news cycle throughout his campaign, while Biden's messaging has been much more consistent, focusing primarily on health care and the economy.