Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

Facebook is doubling down on its big pitch to lawmakers across the globe: regulate us.

Yes, but: Key regulators aren't buying it. Hours after Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg met with lawmakers in Europe to discuss the company's new proposals for regulation, a French commissioner overseeing the EU's data strategy rejected the plan, saying "It’s not enough. It’s too slow, it’s too low in terms of responsibility and regulation."

Why it matters: Facebook hopes that by embracing the push for regulation, it can build more trust with policymakers and better influence future regulation in its favor. But so far policymakers are wary of Facebook's attempts to help write its own rules.

Driving the news: In an op-ed in the Financial Times Monday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg called for more regulation around four key areas: transparency around content moderation, political ads, openness around data sharing, and oversight and accountability.

"I believe good regulation may hurt Facebook’s business in the near term but it will be better for everyone, including us, over the long term."
— Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in an op-ed in the Financial Times

Zuckerberg's op-ed teased Facebook's second white paper out Monday which lays out questions regulators may want to consider when thinking about ways to craft regulation. He noted that the company is currently working with governments, including in France and New Zealand, on what regulation could look like.

  • Flashback: Facebook's first white paper of this kind last year laid out questions for regulators around privacy and data portability, specifically.

Details: The paper lays out 4 key questions that Facebook thinks policymakers should ask while crafting regulation for tech companies. The questions address topics that Facebook grapples with itself when trying to create its own policies.

  • How can content regulation best achieve the goal of reducing harmful speech while preserving free expression?
  • How can regulations enhance the accountability of internet platforms?
  • Should regulation require internet companies to meet certain performance targets?
  • Should regulation define which “harmful content” should be prohibited on the internet?

The paper also lays out "principles" that it thinks future regulators should address, like "incentives" for tech companies to balance their own corporate priorities with societal values.

Yes, but: The white paper, as well as previous comments from the tech giant, make it clear that Facebook is making suggestions for regulation that support its current policies and practices, because that's what it thinks works best.

  • For example, in speaking about "incentives," Facebook says that companies "could be incentivized to meet specific targets such as keeping the prevalence of violating content below some agreed threshold."
  • This type of proposal favors policies Facebook is already putting in place. The company says that improvements to its machine learning and technology have dramatically reduced the amount of bad content on its platform.

Our thought bubble: Facebook's bigger problem today lies in addressing the problematic content that its rules permit. If it can get its current policies baked into international regulations, critics will find it harder to fault Facebook's choices for where to set boundaries for acceptable content.

Be smart: Asking for regulation also serves as a helpful reminder to consumers that U.S. lawmakers have done little themselves to address the complicated issues that are much bigger than Facebook, things like privacy, data sharing and political ads.

The big picture: The press blitz comes just days ahead of the U.S. Justice Department's workshop on a critical law that protects Facebook business model, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Bottom line: Facebook has spent the past three years on defense, apologizing to regulators for policies that left its platform vulnerable to election abuse, fraud and privacy violations and defending its policies for empowering free speech. Now, it's going on the offense, asking repeatedly for more regulations but aiming to shape those rules to its wishes.

What's next: Facebook says it plans to publish similar white papers on elections and privacy in the coming months.

Go deeper

Coronavirus cases rise in 25 states

Expand chart
Data: The COVID Tracking Project, state health departments; Map: Andrew Witherspoon, Sara Wise/Axios

New coronavirus infections rose over the past week in half the country.

Why it matters: The U.S. remains largely unable or unwilling to control the spread of the virus.

Updated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 3 a.m. ET: 33,976,447 — Total deaths: 1,014,266 — Total recoveries: 23,644,023Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 3 a.m. ET: 7,233,945 — Total deaths: 206,959 — Total recoveries: 2,840,688 — Total tests: 103,939,667Map.
  3. Education: School-aged children now make up 10% of all U.S COVID-19 cases.
  4. Health: Moderna says its coronavirus vaccine won't be ready until 2021
  5. Travel: CDC: 3,689 COVID-19 or coronavirus-like cases found on cruise ships in U.S. waters — Airlines begin mass layoffs while clinging to hope for federal aid
  6. Business: Real-time data show economy's rebound slowing but still going.
  7. Sports: Steelers-Titans NFL game delayed after coronavirus outbreak.
Updated 3 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Trump signs stopgap bill to prevent government shutdown

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel and President Trump arrives at the U.S. Capitol in March. Photo: Samuel Corum/Getty Images

President Trump signed a bill to extend current levels of government funding after funding expired briefly, White House spokesperson Judd Deere confirmed early Thursday.

Why it matters: The move averts a government shutdown before the Nov. 3 election. The Senate on Wednesday passed the legislation to fund the federal government through Dec. 11, by a vote of 84-10.