Sarah Grillo

Facebook is facing new criticism — including at a Congressional hearing Tuesday — from publishers, politicians and pundits for over-correcting itself in handling allegations of bias against conservatives.

Why it matters: The company takes regular flak from the right for censoring conservative voices. Now critics on the left — along with some non-partisan experts —are saying Facebook is bending too far in addressing conservative complaints. Facebook, which has promised to improve the quality of new on its platform, is stuck in the middle.

The big picture: Facebook says it's committed to values of openness, free speech and accessibility. Those commitments are cast into doubt whenever it takes action on its platform against individual voices or groups to moderate their pages or posts.

  • Because of this, when particular pages continually post misleading stories, the company prefers to downrank and punish them with advertising restrictions rather than ban them outright.
  • Bottom line: Critics don't think this strategy adequately addresses the problem Facebook wishes to solve (and says it's working to solve through a multi-million dollar ad campaign) — eliminating fake news.

The latest: Facebook's head of product policy and counterterrorism, Monika Bickert, was grilled over Facebook's decision to give a financial donation to Republican Rep. Devin Nunes by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) in a House Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday.

  • Jayapal alleged that Facebook is "bending too much to appease right-wing interests that I think are undermining our democracy."
  • Bickert responded, "We try to be even-handed and open about donations."

The hearing comes one day after reports surfaced about a private meeting between Facebook and publishing executives, in which newsroom leaders like Huffington Post editor Lydia Polgreen and Buzzfeed News editor Ben Smith criticized the platform's deference to conservatives.

  • According to The Wall Street Journal, Smith said that the number and type of conservative publications in attendance at the event indicated that Facebook had bought into the idea being promoted by conservatives that mainstream news outlets need to be counterbalanced by right-leaning opinion outlets on the platform.
  • Smith and Polgreen reportedly criticized this way of thinking, arguing that some right-leaning outlets, in particular The Daily Caller (whose editor Neil Patel was also in attendance), do not uphold the same journalistic standards as other right-leaning outlets, like The Weekly Standard.

Last week, Facebook faced backlash for a post defending its decision not to ban InfoWars and other entities that have a history of posting debunked conspiracy theories.

  • "We just don’t think banning Pages for sharing conspiracy theories or false news is the right way to go," the social network said in a Twitter post, responding to the New York Times' Kevin Roose.

Facebook has taken efforts to address allegations of bias on both the left and right.

  • The company said in May that it is bringing in two outside advisers — one to conduct a legal audit of its impact on underrepresented communities and communities of color, and another to advise the company on potential bias against conservative voices.

Go deeper

Bill Clinton slams McConnell and Trump: "Their first value is power"

Former President Bill Clinton on Sunday called Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) vow to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's vacant Supreme Court seat before the next presidential inauguration "superficially hypocritical."

The big picture: Clinton, who nominated Ginsburg to the court in 1993, declined to say whether he thinks Democrats should respond by adding more justices if they take back the Senate and the White House in November. Instead, he called on Republicans to "remember the example Abraham Lincoln set" by not confirming a justice in an election year.

Pelosi: Trump wants to "crush" ACA with Ginsburg replacement

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday that President Trump is rushing to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg because he "wants to crush the Affordable Care Act."

Why it matters: Pelosi wants to steer the conversation around the potential Ginsburg replacement to health care, which polls show is a top issue for voters, especially amid the coronavirus pandemic. The Trump administration has urged the courts to strike down the law, and with it, protections for millions with pre-existing conditions.

Mike Allen, author of AM
Updated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Democrats' Armageddon option

A makeshift memorial outside the Supreme Court yesterday. Photo: Jose Luis Magana/AFP via Getty Images

Furious Democrats are considering total war — profound changes to two branches of government, and even adding stars to the flag — if Republicans jam through a Supreme Court nominee, then lose control of the Senate.

On the table: Adding Supreme Court justices ... eliminating the Senate's 60-vote threshold to end filibusters ... and statehood for D.C. and Puerto Rico. "If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021," Rep. Joe Kennedy III (D-Mass.) tweeted.