Updated Oct 2, 2019

Court packing: Where the 2020 candidates stand

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

Many 2020 candidates have been flirting with the idea of expanding the Supreme Court, while others have fully rejected the idea.

Background: The Constitution allows Congress to change the number of justices that sit on the court. Historically, the number has flexed 7 times. In recent years, Democrats have had little success pushing their picks through: Republicans blocked President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, and pushed Justice Brett Kavanaugh's controversial nomination through.

Who is open to court packing:

Mayor Pete Buttigieg: The Indiana mayor was among the first candidates to talk about court packing. Buttigieg told The Intercept he would work on restructuring the Supreme Court, expanding it to 15 justices, in which 5 justices would be selected by the Court through an unanimous vote. Buttigieg said that would help "de-politicize" the Court.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) said: "We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court. We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that," per Politico. She said she is open to the idea of court packing.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.): Warren said the focus on the Supreme Court should be to reform and depoliticize it, reports Politico. She is open to expanding the Supreme Court.

Tech executive Andrew Yang said expanding the Supreme Court "isn't something that should be ruled out," per the Washington Post. On his campaign website, Yang is more focused on limiting how long justices can serve, proposing an 18-year limit.

Mayor Wayne Messam (D-Fla.): is open to increasing the number of Supreme Court justices, but also said: "Make no mistake, the court is already packed," reports the Washington Post.

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) says he is "taking nothing off the table," and that "our Supreme Court is way out of whack."

Gov. Steve Bullock (D-MT): "I’m open to discussion on different ways we can depoliticize the Supreme Court, including expanding the court."

Who opposes court packing:

President Trump said he "wouldn't entertain" the idea of court packing, reports Reuters. Trump said Democrats have only proposed the idea because "they want to try to catch up."

Former Vice President Joe Biden: "No, I’m not prepared to go on and try to pack the court, because we’ll live to rue that day."

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.): Sanders is against court packing, but believes in imposing term limits, reports Reuters. He said, "My worry is that the next time the Republicans are in power they will do the same thing."

Former HUD Secretary Julián Castro told the Washington Post he is open to reforming the Supreme Court, but not adding more justices.

Former Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) opposes court packing, and has even warned Democrats about the idea, suggesting it would lead to "partisan warfare." Instead, he supports reforms and term limits.

Marianne Williamson told WaPo she doesn't support this idea.

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.): Bennet told WaPo he does not support court packing.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) noted to the WaPo she does not support the idea.

Joe Sestak told WaPo he does not support the idea.

Mixed messages:

Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Tex.): At a rally in Iowa, O'Rourke said court packing is an idea that should be explored. He also proposed doubling the number of seats by 5 to 10. O'Rourke proposed Republicans and Democrats select 5 justices each and the last 5 be selected independently by the justices. But O'Rourke has also told the Post he does not support court packing.

Who hasn't mentioned it:

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.): While Klobuchar hasn't mentioned court packing, she told CBS she is more focused on placing qualified judges in higher courts.

Go deeper: Everything you need to know about every 2020 presidential candidate

Go deeper

Second-term Supreme Court cases to watch

Photo: Nurphoto/Getty Images

The Supreme Court, now with a solid conservative majority after Justice Brett Kavanaugh's appointment, is hearing cases that could have long-term ramifications on immigration, LGBTQ employment protections and access to abortion.

The big picture: The high court — with 5 conservatives and 4 liberals — kept a relatively low profile in its first term this year. But it could hand major wins to Republicans in 2020's second term, emboldened by Kavanaugh's appointment and sharpening their focus as a slew of hot-button disputes work their way up from lower courts.

Key cases to watchArrowUpdated Oct 18, 2019

In the Supreme Court, it's all been building to this

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh on Feb. 5. Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

This fall will present the first real test of whether a Supreme Court with two Trump appointees will deliver the change Republicans dreamed of when they stonewalled the nomination of Merrick Garland.

What's new: The Supreme Court agreed to take up a case on Louisiana's abortion law which requires doctors to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital in order to perform an abortion.

Go deeperArrowOct 4, 2019

The fight for Trump's taxes

Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images

A federal appeals court ruling Friday morning in House Democrats' favor was just one piece of a web of ongoing court and legislative battles to obtain President Trump's tax returns and financial records.

Why it matters: The case to subpoena President Trump's financial records from Mazars USA, his longtime accounting firm, is much farther along in the courts than most of the opposition's other efforts — and it might be Democrats' best chance to make them public.

Go deeperArrowOct 11, 2019