Updated Mar 23, 2018

Congress doesn't love the spending bill, but it passed anyway

Speaker Paul Ryan, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. (Photo: Matt McClain / The Washington Post via Getty Images)

House Speaker Paul Ryan touted the defense spending increase, Sen. Rand Paul angrily tweeted about arcane government spending, and Democrats shook their head at the lack of gun control measures. But most members of Congress accepted the omnibus spending bill for what it is: A giant collection of what has to get done to keep the government functioning, while mustering enough votes to pass.

Why it matters: This is a $1.3 trillion dollar bill affecting every branch of government that passed mostly because it had to. Members voted on it without really reading it, as it was released Wednesday night and passed the Senate shortly after midnight Friday.

The big picture: Passing a spending bill has to be a bipartisan affair, since Republicans don't have the votes to push it through by themselves. Thus, both parties' priorities must be addressed, so few people are actually fully satisfied with the final product.

What Republicans are saying:

  • Conservatives are furious. Here's House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows: "We are growing the size of government at a breakneck pace. And we are doing all of this through a 2,300 page spending bill, written privately by four leadership members, that became public only 24 hours ago."
  • Defense hawks are happy(ish). Here's Ryan: "With the biggest increase in defense funding in 15 years, this critical legislation begins to reverse the damage of the last decade and allows us to create a 21st-century fighting force."
  • Moderates accept it. Sen. Lisa Murkowski: "You know, it was the agreement that we reached ... There’s an awful lot that we quote needed to be in this in order to pass, and it’s kind of like the legislative cleanup list. Seems to me that we ought to have a better process for doing legislation other than waiting for one omnibus.”

What Democrats are saying:

  • Leadership is happy(ish). House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said there was a "tremendous victory" on the domestic side, but denounced the process, including the failed attempt to add protections for Dreamers.
  • Moderates aren't complaining (much). “Everything is the art of compromise," said Sen. Doug Jones. He called a provision to strengthen gun background checks "an important step," adding that "no one should ever, ever think that because it doesn’t have a whole list of things, that that’s not important."
  • Most are disappointed but not shocked that they didn't get more wins on hot-button issues, like guns and immigration. "I’m very disappointed that no really meaningful or major step to prevent gun violence prevention is included," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal. "DACA is a major disappointment as well.”

The bitterest fight: health care. Sens. Lamar Alexander, Patty Murray and Susan Collins failed to come to an agreement on an Affordable Care Act market stabilization deal, as they couldn't reach agreement on abortion language. The three went back and forth in a tense round of Senate floor speeches Thursday afternoon.

Those speeches aren't going to change the outcome: The bill will pass without any kind of stabilization for the ACA, and that was probably their last chance to prevent big premium increases before the 2019 insurance rates are released.

Go deeper

Biden bets it all on South Carolina

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Most Joe Biden admirers Axios interviewed in South Carolina, where he's vowed to win today's primary, said they're unfazed by his embarrassing losses in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada.

Why it matters: Biden has bet it all on South Carolina to position himself as the best alternative to Bernie Sanders — his "good buddy," he tells voters before skewering Sanders' record and ideas.

Coronavirus updates: Market ends worst week since financial crisis

Data: The Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins, the CDC, and China's Health Ministry. Note: China numbers are for the mainland only and U.S. numbers include repatriated citizens.

The stock market ended its worst week since the financial crisis, prompting the Fed to release a statement. Meanwhile, the WHO warned that countries are losing their chance to contain the novel coronavirus and raised its global risk assessment to "very high" Friday.

The big picture: COVID-19 has killed more than 2,860 people and infected more than 84,000 others in over 60 countries and territories outside the epicenter in mainland China. The number of new cases reported outside China now exceed those inside the country.

Go deeperArrowUpdated 12 hours ago - Health

California coronavirus: Latest case has no recent history of international travel

Gov. Gavin Newsom. Photo: Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

A new case of the novel coronavirus in California was announced on Friday after Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday that 33 people had tested positive for the virus, noting the risk to the public remains low.

What's new: An adult woman with chronic health conditions in Santa Clara County who "did not recently travel overseas" or come into contact with anyone known to be ill was confirmed to have contracted the coronavirus on Friday by CDC and California Department of Public Health officials.

Go deeperArrowUpdated 13 hours ago - Health