Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images

Congress has, after more than 100 days, voted to fund the Children's Health Insurance for six years. But we're likely to keep hearing about the program — either as part of campaign ads heading into this year's midterms, or a push for an even longer extension. 

The bottom line: It doesn't matter whose fault it was: The funding delay came at a price. "At a minimum families have experienced anxiety but it is also possible that families may have thought the program was closed and not enrolled their kids. And states have wasted a lot of time and energy developing contingency plans," said Joan Alker of Georgetown's Center for Children and Families.

So who came out of this with the moral high ground? No one. Republicans are going to hit Democrats for voting against children's health insurance as part of the spending bill, and Democrats are going to hit Republicans for using CHIP as political leverage.

  • Sen. Jon Tester of Montana, a vulnerable Democrat, may be in particularly hot water, as he voted against the bill twice (for reasons unrelated to CHIP). The vast majority of congressional Democrats voted against bills that funded CHIP, before voting yesterday to extend the program.
  • It's true that Republicans attached CHIP to the spending bill to attract votes for it. But most of them never actually cast a vote against funding the program. The charge is GOP leadership left the program in limbo for months, refusing to bring a consensus bill up for a vote on its own.
  • Then again, funding entitlements isn't exactly a winning issue for red-state Republicans running against vulnerable Democrats. "R’s took the issue away from D’s but I don’t see R’s using it affirmatively," said a source close to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

For example:

  • Tyler Law, a spokesman for House Democrats' campaign arm: "Republicans hung families out to dry for months and many Americans received notifications that they could lose their insurance. People aren’t going to forget who endangered their child’s healthcare."
  • Michael Ahrens, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee: “Republicans are going to make sure voters remember who stood up for Americans’ priorities, and who stood against them. Now we can add health insurance funding for nearly 9 million children to a growing list of priorities that Democrats obstructed.”

What happens next: Probably nothing, but we could see a push for a longer CHIP extension, or even to make it permanent.

Go deeper

Updated 8 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 10 p.m. ET: 32,471,119 — Total deaths: 987,593 — Total recoveries: 22,374,557Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 10 p.m. ET: 7,032,524 — Total deaths: 203,657 — Total recoveries: 2,727,335 — Total tests: 99,483,712Map.
  3. States: "We’re not closing anything going forward": Florida fully lifts COVID restaurant restrictions — Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam tests positive for coronavirus.
  4. Health: Young people accounted for 20% of cases this summer.
  5. Business: Coronavirus has made airports happier places The expiration of Pandemic Unemployment Assistance looms.
  6. Education: Where bringing students back to school is most risky.
Mike Allen, author of AM
11 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Biden pushes unity message in new TV wave

A fresh Joe Biden ad, "New Start," signals an effort by his campaign to make unity a central theme, underscoring a new passage in his stump speech that says he won't be a president just for Democrats but for all Americans.

What he's saying: The ad — which began Friday night, and is a follow-up to "Fresh Start" — draws from a Biden speech earlier in the week in Manitowoc, Wisconsin:

Trump prepares to announce Amy Coney Barrett as Supreme Court replacement

Judge Amy Coney Barrett. Photo: Matt Cashore/Notre Dame University via Reuters

President Trump is preparing to nominate federal appeals court Judge Amy Coney Barrett of Indiana, a favorite of both the social conservative base and Republican elected officials, to succeed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Republican sources tell Axios.

Why it matters: Barrett would push the already conservative court further and harder to the right, for decades to come, on the most important issues in American politics — from abortion to the limits of presidential power. If confirmed, she would give conservatives a 6-3 majority on the high court.