After months of talks on bipartisan legislation, Senate Commerce Committee leaders have unveiled dueling privacy bills ahead of a hearing this week. But insiders believe the process might still yield a compromise both parties can embrace.

What they're saying: "Now there’s actually opportunity for serious negotiations between the different positions," said Jules Polonetsky, CEO of the Future of Privacy Forum, which did a comparison of the two bills. "These bills have more in common than they have dividing them."

The Republican version: Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) circulated his discussion draft, the United States Consumer Data Privacy Act, last week.

  • It would provide consumers with the ability to access, correct, delete and port data companies have about them, and it would provide limited rule-making authority to the Federal Trade Commission, according to a copy obtained by Axios.
  • But it would also preempt state privacy regulations and would not provide individual citizens with a private right of action to sue companies, two sticking points for Democrats.

The Democratic version: Sen. Maria Cantwell's (D-Wash.) Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act, also announced last week, gives the FTC greater enforcement authority and would allow consumers to enforce the law by bringing civil lawsuits.

  • "Both bills take the idea that privacy needs to be protected seriously," said Free Press senior policy counsel Gaurav Laroia.

Meanwhile, Privacy for America, a coalition of advertising industry trade groups, has a "new paradigm" for privacy out Tuesday that it sees as a third way forward on the issue.

  • Rather than focusing on obtaining consumers' consent to share data over and over, the framework calls for banning data practices that could lead to misuse, such as using data to make housing or credit eligibility decisions.
  • The idea came after a consumer survey showed that people have "notice fatigue" on privacy policies, said Stu Ingis, an adviser to the group and chairman of Venable. "The goal is to have strong protections and strong enforcement for consumers, and we think our approach does that in ways that have not previously been offered."

Yes, but: The framework would preempt California's landmark privacy law and would not allow for a private right of action.

  • "I think both of those issues become less important if you have strong protections," Ingis said.

What's next: The Wednesday hearing will likely show whether Commerce committee members are still trying to reach a compromise.

  • The House Energy & Commerce committee has been quietly working on bipartisan privacy legislation as well.

Go deeper: The future of privacy starts in California

Go deeper

Parties trade election influence accusations at Big Tech hearing

Photo: Michael Reynolds/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

A Senate hearing Wednesday with Big Tech CEOs became the backdrop for Democrats and Republicans to swap accusations of inappropriate electioneering.

Why it matters: Once staid tech policy debates are quickly becoming a major focal point of American culture and political wars, as both parties fret about the impact of massive social networks being the new public square.

1 hour ago - World

Germany goes back into lockdown

Photo: Fabrizio Bensch/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

German Chancellor Angela Merkel will enact one of Europe's strictest coronavirus lockdowns since spring, closing bars and restaurants nationwide for most of November, Reuters reports.

Why it matters: Germany is the latest European country to reimpose some form of lockdown measures amid a surge in cases across the continent.

How overhyping became an election meddling tool

Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios

As online platforms and intelligence officials get more sophisticated about detecting and stamping out election meddling campaigns, bad actors are increasingly seeing the appeal of instead exaggerating their own interference capabilities to shake Americans' confidence in democracy.

Why it matters: It doesn't take a sophisticated operation to sow seeds of doubt in an already fractious and factionalized U.S. Russia proved that in 2016, and fresh schemes aimed at the 2020 election may already be proving it anew.