An Amazon's fulfillment center in Baltimore. Photo: Erica Pandey/Axios

In yet another win for bigness and big companies, Amazon may be leaving the small suppliers who rely on its platform in the dust.

What's happening: Amazon is culling its supplier list, getting rid of small players in favor of big brands and conglomerates like Procter & Gamble, Sony and Lego, which offer wholesale prices, reports Bloomberg.

Why it matters: With the rise of supercenters like Walmart in the 20th century, smaller manufacturers and businesses were effectively banished from main streets. Now, Amazon, which has already been grabbing market share, may purge them from the web, too.

  • "Efficiency and profitability are the issues here," says James Thomson, a former Amazon executive who now consults for sellers on the platform. Amazon is trying to slash away costs in its retail business and working with primarily major suppliers will help the company do that.
  • For example, when it comes to products affected by the trade war, conglomerates with deep pockets have options, including shifting production out of China, to keep tariffs from turning into price hikes. Smaller suppliers can't do the same.
  • Amazon reportedly told some smaller suppliers that it will only pay 5% more to buy products that are tariffed 25%, per the Washington Post.

Small companies still have the option of selling directly on Amazon's website, but hunting for individual customers amid an ocean of products and users is much messier than selling in bulk to the behemoth, Bloomberg notes.

  • On top of that, Amazon has increased the cut it takes from merchants per sale since it first opened up its platform to third-party sellers.

In a statement to Axios, Amazon strongly disputed the Bloomberg report:

"We informed Bloomberg prior to publication of their article that their sources and story are wrong. We review our selling partner relationships on an individual basis as part of our normal course of business and any speculation of a large scale reduction of vendors is incorrect. Like any business, we make changes when we see an opportunity to provide customers with improved selection, value and convenience, and we do this thoughtfully and considerately on a case-by-case basis.”

Go deeper

Bill Clinton slams McConnell and Trump: "Their first value is power"

Former President Bill Clinton on Sunday called Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) vow to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's vacant Supreme Court seat before the next presidential inauguration "superficially hypocritical."

The big picture: Clinton, who nominated Ginsburg to the court in 1993, declined to say whether he thinks Democrats should respond by adding more justices if they take back the Senate and the White House in November. Instead, he called on Republicans to "remember the example Abraham Lincoln set" by not confirming a justice in an election year.

Pelosi: Trump wants to "crush" ACA with Ginsburg replacement

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday that President Trump is rushing to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg because he "wants to crush the Affordable Care Act."

Why it matters: Pelosi wants to steer the conversation around the potential Ginsburg replacement to health care, which polls show is a top issue for voters, especially amid the coronavirus pandemic. The Trump administration has urged the courts to strike down the law, and with it, protections for millions with pre-existing conditions.

Mike Allen, author of AM
Updated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Democrats' Armageddon option

A makeshift memorial outside the Supreme Court yesterday. Photo: Jose Luis Magana/AFP via Getty Images

Furious Democrats are considering total war — profound changes to two branches of government, and even adding stars to the flag — if Republicans jam through a Supreme Court nominee then lose control of the Senate.

On the table: Adding Supreme Court justices ... eliminating the Senate's 60-vote threshold to end filibusters ... and statehood for D.C. and Puerto Rico. "If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021," Rep. Joe Kennedy III (D-Mass.) tweeted.