Sustainability comms gets more selective
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
Sustainability has become one of the clearest tests of modern corporate communications, forcing leaders to satisfy investors, customers, employees, policymakers and activists who increasingly want different things.
Why it matters: Environmental messaging faces pressure from every direction.
- The Trump administration has encouraged scrutiny and even legal pressure on companies over ESG policies.
- Higher prices have made affordability the top priority for many consumers, complicating values-heavy messaging.
- Companies that quietly abandon environmental commitments face criticism from employees and climate groups.
- Activist investors have mounted campaigns and pushed for votes on more aggressive environmental stances.
Catch up quick: Just a few years ago, companies raced to make bold public climate pledges, backed by splashy ads. Today, they're far more deliberate about how, when and to whom they communicate such commitments.
What we're hearing: There hasn't been a significant reduction in actual corporate environmental reporting, says Tyler Spalding, chief marketing, communications and engagement officer at JUST Capital.
- Investors see management of environmental and other stakeholder issues as a signal of overall management quality, which continues to encourage companies to measure and disclose their progress, he explained.
- And despite hostility from the Trump administration, renewable energy is, in many cases, the cheapest form of electricity.
- So instead, companies are focusing on communicating "at the right time, to the right people."
Between the lines: Talking about "nature-based solutions" is one way for companies to signal their environmental commitments, said Frank Sesno, a professor at George Washington University and executive director of the GW Alliance for a Sustainable Future.
- Microsoft, Google and Amazon have blog posts and landing pages detailing their investment in these kinds of projects.
Zoom in: Rather than leading with sustainability, Panera Bread prioritizes messages that resonate across its broad customer base, chief corporate affairs officer Brooke Buchanan explains.
- "There's a multitude of factors for where someone chooses to shop, to buy, to eat," she says. "For some of our guests, [environmental sustainability] may be a factor. And for others, it may not."
- Panera continues to update its sustainability policies — including a recently added seafood policy to cover new menu items. But the company frames those efforts within its broader business and customer strategy rather than making sustainability the centerpiece.
What we're watching: I asked Axios national energy correspondent Amy Harder what she's keeping an eye on in sustainability comms.
- She's monitoring how Big Tech companies that have largely stuck with their climate-goal messaging are perceived as we approach 2030, when some of those goals are set to be met.
- The AI expansion will also be hard to reconcile with climate ambitions, especially as investments in the technology funnel resources away from sustainability initiatives.
What's next: Climate Week NYC in September will show whether companies are comfortable making new public commitments — or whether this new era of targeted, stakeholder-specific communications is here to stay.
Go deeper: Microsoft's AI boom collides with its climate goals
