David Sacks' "Goldilocks" scenario
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Screenshot: @DavidSacks/X
David Sacks — famed tech founder & investor, co-host of the "All-In Podcast" ("The Rainman") and now White House special adviser for AI & crypto — declared Saturday on X that "Doomer narratives were wrong" about AI.
Why it matters: The big takeaway from Sacks' post is that the fear of one AI frontier model dominating all now looks far-fetched, since high-performing competing models are diffusing power.
"The AI race is highly dynamic so this could change," Sacks wrote. "But right now the current situation is Goldilocks":
- "We have 5 major American companies vigorously competing on frontier models. This brings out the best in everyone and helps America win the AI race."
- "So far, we have avoided a monopolistic outcome that vests all power and control in a single entity."
- "There is likely to be a major role for open source. These models excel at providing 80-90% of the capability at 10-20% of the cost. This tradeoff will be highly attractive to customers who value customization, control, and cost over frontier capabilities. China has gone all-in on open source, so it would be good to see more American companies competing in this area, as OpenAI just did. (Meta also deserves credit.)"
- "There is likely to be a division of labor between generalized foundation models and specific verticalized applications. Instead of a single superintelligence capturing all the value, we are likely to see numerous agentic applications solving 'last mile' problems. This is great news for the startup ecosystem."
- "There is also an increasingly clear division of labor between humans and AI. Despite all the wondrous progress, AI models are still at zero in terms of setting their own objective function. Models need context, they must be heavily prompted, the output must be verified, and this process must be repeated iteratively to achieve meaningful business value.
Reality check: As Axios' Scott Rosenberg noted recently, the history of tech shows that early dominant players could still fall to a competitor not yet born: Google came along to dominate what seemed like a well-established search industry in the early dot-com era.
The bottom line: The "current state of vigorous competition is healthy," Sacks concluded. "It propels innovation forward, helps America win the AI race, and avoids centralized control. This is good news — that the Doomers did not expect."
Sacks added this mea culpa after Elon Musk responded to his 600-word broadside. Smart Brevity for the win!
- Go deeper: White House AI Action Plan (July 23) and crypto report (July 30).
